From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: fix possible RPM ref leaking during RPS disabling Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 15:54:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20140513135440.GI3908@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1399908905-3025-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com> <20140512175157.GC25056@phenom.ffwll.local> <1399988770.5451.3.camel@intelbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842B06E656 for ; Tue, 13 May 2014 06:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id m15so411437wgh.4 for ; Tue, 13 May 2014 06:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1399988770.5451.3.camel@intelbox> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Imre Deak Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:46:10PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 19:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 06:35:04PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > > In > > > > > > commit c6df39b5ea6342323a42edfbeeca0a28c643d7ae > > > Author: Imre Deak > > > Date: Mon Apr 14 20:24:29 2014 +0300 > > > > > > drm/i915: get a runtime PM ref for the deferred GT powersave enabling > > > > > > I added an RPM get-ref when enabling RPS from a deferred work, but forgot > > > to add the corresponding put-ref when canceling the work. This may leave > > > RPM disabled. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak > > > > Could we intentionally hit this by e.g. racing a suspend/resume against > > runtime pm? E.g. > > 1. disable all outputs, make sure we've entered runtime pm > > 2. set runtime autosuspend delay to 0 > > 3. suspend/resume > > 4. autosuspend (hopefully, my understanding is a bit unclear) > > > > ->Boom > > > > Would look nice as an igt subtest if it works ;-) > > Yep, works consistently as expected both before and after the fix. I > pushed the new subtest, please add here: > Testcase: igt/pm_pc8/system-suspend Now I'm confused: I expected this to blow up without your fix here, and not work with or without it?! Please unconfuse ... -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch