From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm: Support legacy cursor ioctls via
 universal planes when possible (v2)
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:28:35 +0200
Message-ID: <20140519072835.GE8790@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1400203049-21385-2-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
 <1400279896-26112-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
 <CAKMK7uFgD6LiXi3vEM011uSEnU007M5JiPf=gYtRK=PLrRtORA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com (mail-ee0-f45.google.com [74.125.83.45])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8C26E5CF
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Mon, 19 May 2014 00:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f45.google.com with SMTP id d49so3233530eek.4
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Mon, 19 May 2014 00:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uFgD6LiXi3vEM011uSEnU007M5JiPf=gYtRK=PLrRtORA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

I didn't spot anything else, so with the below issue addressed this patch
is Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:43:04AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> > +       if (ret) {
> > +               if (req->flags & DRM_MODE_CURSOR_BO)
> > +                       drm_mode_rmfb(dev, &fb->base.id, file_priv);
> > +               return ret;
> > +       }
> 
> With the new refcount logic an unconditional
> drm_framebuffer_unreference should be here instead of this. I think,
> but please double-check since it's late here ;-)
> -Daniel
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch