From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Only copy back the modified fields to userspace from execbuffer
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 13:59:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140523115913.GS14357@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400838352-19420-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:45:52AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We only want to modifiy a single field in the userspace view of the
> execbuffer command buffer, so explicitly change that rather than copy
> everything back again.
>
> This serves two purposes:
>
> 1. The single fields are much cheaper to copy (constant size so the
> copy uses special case code) and much smaller than the whole array.
>
> 2. We modify the array for internal use that need to be masked from
> the user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Yeah, makes sense, both as a bugfix for the batch bias EINVAL confusion
and in general. Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the patch. And I've
applied the batch bias patch again, too.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index b4020b9503fe..3a30133f93e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -797,9 +797,9 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_relocate_slow(struct drm_device *dev,
> * relocations were valid.
> */
> for (j = 0; j < exec[i].relocation_count; j++) {
> - if (copy_to_user(&user_relocs[j].presumed_offset,
> - &invalid_offset,
> - sizeof(invalid_offset))) {
> + if (__copy_to_user(&user_relocs[j].presumed_offset,
> + &invalid_offset,
> + sizeof(invalid_offset))) {
> ret = -EFAULT;
> mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> goto err;
> @@ -1460,18 +1460,21 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>
> ret = i915_gem_do_execbuffer(dev, data, file, &exec2, exec2_list);
> if (!ret) {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object __user *user_exec_list =
> + to_user_ptr(args->buffers_ptr);
> +
> /* Copy the new buffer offsets back to the user's exec list. */
> - for (i = 0; i < args->buffer_count; i++)
> - exec_list[i].offset = exec2_list[i].offset;
> - /* ... and back out to userspace */
> - ret = copy_to_user(to_user_ptr(args->buffers_ptr),
> - exec_list,
> - sizeof(*exec_list) * args->buffer_count);
> - if (ret) {
> - ret = -EFAULT;
> - DRM_DEBUG("failed to copy %d exec entries "
> - "back to user (%d)\n",
> - args->buffer_count, ret);
> + for (i = 0; i < args->buffer_count; i++) {
> + ret = __copy_to_user(&user_exec_list[i].offset,
> + &exec2_list[i].offset,
> + sizeof(user_exec_list[i].offset));
> + if (ret) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + DRM_DEBUG("failed to copy %d exec entries "
> + "back to user (%d)\n",
> + args->buffer_count, ret);
> + break;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1522,14 +1525,21 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer2(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> ret = i915_gem_do_execbuffer(dev, data, file, args, exec2_list);
> if (!ret) {
> /* Copy the new buffer offsets back to the user's exec list. */
> - ret = copy_to_user(to_user_ptr(args->buffers_ptr),
> - exec2_list,
> - sizeof(*exec2_list) * args->buffer_count);
> - if (ret) {
> - ret = -EFAULT;
> - DRM_DEBUG("failed to copy %d exec entries "
> - "back to user (%d)\n",
> - args->buffer_count, ret);
> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *user_exec_list =
> + to_user_ptr(args->buffers_ptr);
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < args->buffer_count; i++) {
> + ret = __copy_to_user(&user_exec_list[i].offset,
> + &exec2_list[i].offset,
> + sizeof(user_exec_list[i].offset));
> + if (ret) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + DRM_DEBUG("failed to copy %d exec entries "
> + "back to user\n",
> + args->buffer_count);
> + break;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.0.0.rc2
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-23 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-23 9:45 [PATCH] drm/i915: Only copy back the modified fields to userspace from execbuffer Chris Wilson
2014-05-23 11:59 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140523115913.GS14357@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox