From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [v2] drm/i915: Add support for Generic MIPI panel driver Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 13:37:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20140527113723.GF14357@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1397454507-10273-5-git-send-email-shobhit.kumar@intel.com> <1400861127-11475-1-git-send-email-shobhit.kumar@intel.com> <20140527110243.GA18389@strange.amr.corp.intel.com> <53847553.2040703@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com (mail-wg0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8759D6E09D for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 04:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id x13so9346049wgg.10 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 04:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53847553.2040703@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: "Kumar, Shobhit" Cc: Jani Nikula , Daniel Vetter , intel-gfx List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:51:55PM +0530, Kumar, Shobhit wrote: > On 5/27/2014 4:32 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote: > >On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:35:27PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: > >>This driver makes use of the generic panel information from the VBT. > >>Panel information is classified into two - panel configuration and panel > >>power sequence which is unique to each panel. The generic driver uses the > >>panel configuration and sequence parsed from VBT block #52 and #53 > >> > >>v2: Address review comments by Jani > >> - Move all of the things in driver c file from header > >> - Make all functions static > >> - Make use of video/mipi_display.c instead of redefining > >> - Null checks during sequence execution > >> > >>v3: Address review comments by Damien > >> - Rename the panel driver file as intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c > >> - Fix style changes as suggested > >> - Correct comments for lp->hs and hs->lp count calculations > >> - General updating comments to have more clarity > >> - using max() instead of ternary operator > >> - Fix names (ui_num, ui_den) while using UI in calculations > >> - compute max of lp_to_hs switch and hs_to_lp switch while computing > >> hs_lp_switch_count > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar > > > >Hopefully still works after all that :) > > It does, at least on AsusT100 :) Thanks for the review Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch