public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] drm/i915: Add vblank based delayed watermark update mechanism
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 18:10:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140604161044.GN7416@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGT7NaMU_M0JU=CNVOidetAFjfKqGj=W0r9g=pMGiD8gEw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 11:01:01AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > This function is only called at init/resume. It populates the software
> > state with something that matches the current hardware state. I guess
> > a comment explaning the purpose of the function is the best we can do
> > here, or do you have a better idea?
> 
> The problem is that we can use the get_hw_state functions not only to
> check driver state a init/resume, but also to do state tracking
> assertions at certain points of the code. Since most (all?) the other
> HW state readout functions don't have side-effects, there's a
> possibility that someone may add code to do HW state assertion at some
> points, and just call these things without realizing the potential
> side effects. A comment would help, but moving the assignment to
> another place would also solve the problem for me. You choose.

We already do that in other places, e.g. the edp bit depth hacks we have.
But a comment might be justified.

I haven't looked at the details here, just a high-level comment that we do
play such ugly tricks already. And I agree that it's unexpected.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-04 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-22 14:48 [PATCH v2 00/16] drm/i915: Two part watermark update for ILK+, part 2 ville.syrjala
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] drm/i915: Keep vblank interrupts enabled while enabling/disabling planes ville.syrjala
2014-05-26 13:56   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-04  6:00     ` Arun Murthy
2014-06-10 16:22       ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915: Leave interrupts enabled while disabling crtcs during suspend ville.syrjala
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915: Check hw vs. sw watermark state after programming ville.syrjala
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915: Refactor ilk_validate_pipe_wm() ville.syrjala
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] drm/i915: Refactor ilk_update_wm ville.syrjala
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915: Add dev_priv->wm.mutex ville.syrjala
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] drm/i915: Add vblank based delayed watermark update mechanism ville.syrjala
2014-06-03 18:50   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-06-03 19:32     ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-06-04 14:01       ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-06-04 16:10         ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-06-09 15:01           ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] drm/i915: Split watermark programming into pre and post steps ville.syrjala
2014-06-03 20:51   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-06-04 16:22     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-09 17:03       ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-06-10 11:46         ` Jani Nikula
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/i915: Actually perform the watermark update in two phases ville.syrjala
2014-06-03 22:47   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-06-09 18:28     ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] drm/i915: Wait for watermark updates to finish before disabling a pipe ville.syrjala
2014-06-04 13:54   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915: Refactor get_other_active_crtc() ville.syrjala
2014-06-04 16:59   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915: Disable LP1+ watermarks while changing the number of active pipes ville.syrjala
2014-06-04 18:24   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-06-09 16:51     ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] drm/i915: Keep track of who disabled LP1+ watermarks ville.syrjala
2014-06-04 18:30   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915: Prefer the 5/6 DDB split when primary is disabled ville.syrjala
2014-06-04 18:34   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915: Add a workaround for sprite only <-> primary only switching ville.syrjala
2014-06-04 18:44   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-05-22 14:48 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915: Don't disable LP1+ watermarks for every frame when scaled ville.syrjala
2014-06-04 18:49   ` Paulo Zanoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140604161044.GN7416@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox