From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: oscar.mateo@intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/53] drm/i915: Abstract the workload submission mechanism away
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:40:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618204023.GC5821@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402673891-14618-37-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:37:54PM +0100, oscar.mateo@intel.com wrote:
> From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
>
> As suggested by Daniel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 25 +++++++---------
> 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 3e9983c..89b6d5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1554,6 +1554,23 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
> /* Old ums support infrastructure, same warning applies. */
> struct i915_ums_state ums;
>
> + /* Abstract the submission mechanism (legacy ringbuffer or execlists) away */
> + struct {
> + int (*do_execbuf) (struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
> + struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> + struct intel_context *ctx,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args,
> + struct list_head *vmas,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj,
> + u64 exec_start, u32 flags);
> + int (*add_request) (struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> + struct drm_file *file,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> + u32 *out_seqno);
Hm, what do we need add_request for? With the clean split in command
submission I'd expect every function to know whether it'll submit to an
lrc (everything in intel_lrc.c) or whether it'll submit to a legacy ring
(existing code), so I don't see a need for an add_request vfunc.
Au contraire that looks a bit dangerous since code might get run with
execlist that assumes we have a legcy ring ...
A bit confused, but let's hope this clears up in further patches.
-Daniel
> + int (*init_rings) (struct drm_device *dev);
> + void (*cleanup_ring) (struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
> + } gt;
> +
> /*
> * NOTE: This is the dri1/ums dungeon, don't add stuff here. Your patch
> * will be rejected. Instead look for a better place.
> @@ -2131,6 +2148,14 @@ void i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_file *file,
> struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
> +int i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct drm_file *file,
> + struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> + struct intel_context *ctx,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args,
> + struct list_head *vmas,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj,
> + u64 exec_start, u32 flags);
> int i915_gem_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct drm_file *file_priv);
> int i915_gem_execbuffer2(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> @@ -2281,6 +2306,7 @@ void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev);
> bool i915_gem_clflush_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool force);
> int __must_check i915_gem_object_finish_gpu(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
> int __must_check i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev);
> +int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev);
> int __must_check i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev);
> int i915_gem_l3_remap(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, int slice);
> void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_device *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 69db71a..7c10540 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2310,19 +2310,16 @@ i915_gem_get_seqno(struct drm_device *dev, u32 *seqno)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> - struct drm_file *file,
> - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> - u32 *out_seqno)
> +static int i915_gem_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> + struct drm_file *file,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> + u32 *out_seqno)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> u32 request_ring_position, request_start;
> int ret;
>
> - if (intel_enable_execlists(ring->dev))
> - return intel_logical_ring_add_request(ring, file, obj, out_seqno);
> -
> request_start = intel_ring_get_tail(ring->buffer);
> /*
> * Emit any outstanding flushes - execbuf can fail to emit the flush
> @@ -2403,6 +2400,16 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> + struct drm_file *file,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> + u32 *out_seqno)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
> +
> + return dev_priv->gt.add_request(ring, file, obj, out_seqno);
> +}
> +
> static inline void
> i915_gem_request_remove_from_client(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> {
> @@ -4627,7 +4634,7 @@ intel_enable_blt(struct drm_device *dev)
> return true;
> }
>
> -static int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev)
> +int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> int ret;
> @@ -4710,10 +4717,7 @@ i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev);
>
> - if (intel_enable_execlists(dev))
> - ret = intel_logical_rings_init(dev);
> - else
> - ret = i915_gem_init_rings(dev);
> + ret = dev_priv->gt.init_rings(dev);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -4751,6 +4755,18 @@ int i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("allow wake ack timed out\n");
> }
>
> + if (intel_enable_execlists(dev)) {
> + dev_priv->gt.do_execbuf = intel_execlists_submission;
> + dev_priv->gt.add_request = intel_logical_ring_add_request;
> + dev_priv->gt.init_rings = intel_logical_rings_init;
> + dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_logical_ring_cleanup;
> + } else {
> + dev_priv->gt.do_execbuf = i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission;
> + dev_priv->gt.add_request = i915_gem_add_request;
> + dev_priv->gt.init_rings = i915_gem_init_rings;
> + dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_cleanup_ring_buffer;
> + }
> +
> i915_gem_init_userptr(dev);
> i915_gem_init_global_gtt(dev);
>
> @@ -4785,12 +4801,8 @@ i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(struct drm_device *dev)
> struct intel_engine_cs *ring;
> int i;
>
> - for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i) {
> - if (intel_enable_execlists(dev))
> - intel_logical_ring_cleanup(ring);
> - else
> - intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(ring);
> - }
> + for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
> + dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring(ring);
> }
>
> int
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 36c7f0c..f0dd31f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -1005,14 +1005,15 @@ i915_reset_gen7_sol_offsets(struct drm_device *dev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int
> -legacy_ringbuffer_submission(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
> - struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> - struct intel_context *ctx,
> - struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args,
> - struct list_head *vmas,
> - struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj,
> - u64 exec_start, u32 flags)
> +int
> +i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct drm_file *file,
> + struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> + struct intel_context *ctx,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args,
> + struct list_head *vmas,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj,
> + u64 exec_start, u32 flags)
> {
> struct drm_clip_rect *cliprects = NULL;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> @@ -1379,12 +1380,8 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> else
> exec_start += i915_gem_obj_offset(batch_obj, vm);
>
> - if (intel_enable_execlists(dev))
> - ret = intel_execlists_submission(dev, file, ring, ctx,
> - args, &eb->vmas, batch_obj, exec_start, flags);
> - else
> - ret = legacy_ringbuffer_submission(dev, file, ring, ctx,
> - args, &eb->vmas, batch_obj, exec_start, flags);
> + ret = dev_priv->gt.do_execbuf(dev, file, ring, ctx, args,
> + &eb->vmas, batch_obj, exec_start, flags);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
>
> --
> 1.9.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 149+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-13 15:37 [PATCH 00/53] Execlists v3 oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 01/53] drm/i915: Extract context backing object allocation oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 02/53] drm/i915: Rename ctx->obj to ctx->render_obj oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 17:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 15:20 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 17:15 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 03/53] drm/i915: Add a dev pointer to the context oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 04/53] drm/i915: Extract ringbuffer destroy & make alloc outside accesible oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 21:39 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-19 10:42 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 05/53] drm/i915: Move i915_gem_validate_context() to i915_gem_context.c oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 17:11 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-16 15:18 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-18 20:00 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 06/53] drm/i915/bdw: Introduce one context backing object per engine oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 20:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 8:52 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-19 10:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 07/53] drm/i915/bdw: New file for Logical Ring Contexts and Execlists oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 20:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 9:01 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 08/53] drm/i915/bdw: Macro for LRCs and module option for Execlists oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 20:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 9:04 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 09/53] drm/i915/bdw: Initialization for Logical Ring Contexts oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 20:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 9:23 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-19 10:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 10:10 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-19 10:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 10/53] drm/i915/bdw: A bit more advanced context init/fini oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 22:13 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-19 6:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 11/53] drm/i915/bdw: Allocate ringbuffers for Logical Ring Contexts oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 22:19 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-23 12:07 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 12/53] drm/i915/bdw: Populate LR contexts (somewhat) oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 23:24 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-23 12:42 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-23 15:05 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-23 15:11 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 13/53] drm/i915/bdw: Deferred creation of user-created LRCs oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 20:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 14/53] drm/i915/bdw: Render moot context reset and switch when LRCs are enabled oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 15/53] drm/i915/bdw: Don't write PDP in the legacy way when using LRCs oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 23:42 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-23 12:45 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 16/53] drm/i915/bdw: Skeleton for the new logical rings submission path oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 17/53] drm/i915/bdw: Generic logical ring init and cleanup oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 18/53] drm/i915/bdw: New header file for LRs, LRCs and Execlists oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 19/53] drm/i915: Extract pipe control fini & make init outside accesible oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 20:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 0:04 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-19 10:58 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 20/53] drm/i915/bdw: GEN-specific logical ring init oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 21/53] drm/i915/bdw: GEN-specific logical ring set/get seqno oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 22/53] drm/i915: Make ring_space more generic and outside accesible oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 23/53] drm/i915: Generalize intel_ring_get_tail oscar.mateo
2014-06-20 20:17 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 24/53] drm/i915: Make intel_ring_stopped outside accesible oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 25/53] drm/i915/bdw: GEN-specific logical ring submit context (somewhat) oscar.mateo
2014-06-20 20:28 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-23 12:49 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring submission mechanism oscar.mateo
2014-06-20 21:00 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-23 13:09 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-23 13:13 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-23 13:18 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-23 13:27 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-23 13:36 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-23 13:41 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-23 14:35 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-23 19:10 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-24 12:29 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-07-07 12:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-24 0:23 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-06-24 11:45 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-24 14:41 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-24 17:19 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-06-26 13:28 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-07-07 12:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 27/53] drm/i915/bdw: GEN-specific logical ring emit request oscar.mateo
2014-06-20 21:18 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-23 15:48 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 28/53] drm/i915/bdw: GEN-specific logical ring emit flush oscar.mateo
2014-06-20 21:39 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 29/53] drm/i915/bdw: Emission of requests with logical rings oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 30/53] drm/i915/bdw: Ring idle and stop " oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 31/53] drm/i915/bdw: Interrupts " oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 32/53] drm/i915/bdw: GEN-specific logical ring emit batchbuffer start oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 33/53] drm/i915: Extract the actual workload submission mechanism from execbuffer oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 34/53] drm/i915: Make move_to_active and retire_commands outside accesible oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 35/53] drm/i915/bdw: Workload submission mechanism for Execlists oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 36/53] drm/i915: Abstract the workload submission mechanism away oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 20:40 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 37/53] drm/i915/bdw: Implement context switching (somewhat) oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 17:00 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 38/53] drm/i915/bdw: Write the tail pointer, LRC style oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 39/53] drm/i915/bdw: Two-stage execlist submit process oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 40/53] drm/i915/bdw: Handle context switch events oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:37 ` [PATCH 41/53] drm/i915/bdw: Avoid non-lite-restore preemptions oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 20:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-23 11:52 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-07-07 12:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 42/53] drm/i915/bdw: Make sure gpu reset still works with Execlists oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 20:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 9:37 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 43/53] drm/i915/bdw: Make sure error capture keeps working " oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 16:54 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 20:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 20:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 44/53] drm/i915/bdw: Help out the ctx switch interrupt handler oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 45/53] drm/i915/bdw: Do not call intel_runtime_pm_get() in an interrupt oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 20:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-26 10:27 ` Chris Wilson
2014-07-28 8:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-29 7:37 ` Chris Wilson
2014-07-29 10:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-08 9:20 ` Chris Wilson
2014-08-08 9:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-08 13:41 ` Greg KH
2014-08-09 0:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-09 0:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-09 1:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alan Stern
2014-08-09 8:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-10 1:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 46/53] drm/i915/bdw: Display execlists info in debugfs oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 20:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 47/53] drm/i915/bdw: Display context backing obj & ringbuffer " oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 48/53] drm/i915/bdw: Print context state " oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 49/53] drm/i915: Extract render state preparation oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 50/53] drm/i915/bdw: Render state init for Execlists oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 51/53] drm/i915/bdw: Document Logical Rings, LR contexts and Execlists oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 16:51 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-16 15:24 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-16 17:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17 8:22 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-17 9:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17 9:46 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-17 10:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17 10:12 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 52/53] drm/i915/bdw: Enable logical ring contexts oscar.mateo
2014-06-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 53/53] !UPSTREAM: drm/i915: Use MMIO flips oscar.mateo
2014-06-18 21:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 9:50 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-19 10:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 10:13 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-19 10:33 ` Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-06-18 21:26 ` [PATCH 00/53] Execlists v3 Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140618204023.GC5821@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=oscar.mateo@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox