From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Extract the actual workload submission mechanism from execbuffer Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:02:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20140630140247.34a9c6aa@jbarnes-desktop> References: <1403789059-5692-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com> <1403789059-5692-9-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com [209.85.220.52]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B6D6E215 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:02:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id eu11so9301669pac.39 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:02:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1403789059-5692-9-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: oscar.mateo@intel.com Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:24:19 +0100 oscar.mateo@intel.com wrote: > From: Oscar Mateo > > So that we isolate the legacy ringbuffer submission mechanism, which becomes > a good candidate to be abstracted away. This is prep-work for Execlists (which > will its own workload submission mechanism). "will have" ? > > No functional changes. Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center