From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Extract context backing
 object allocation
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:31:32 +0200
Message-ID: <20140708103132.GX17271@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1404401285-19918-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com>
 <20140708093926.GJ26405@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (mail-wg0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5686E521
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Tue,  8 Jul 2014 03:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a1so2314284wgh.8
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 03:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140708093926.GJ26405@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, oscar.mateo@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:39:26AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 04:27:58PM +0100, oscar.mateo@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
> > 
> > This is preparatory work for Execlists: we plan to use it later to
> > allocate our own context objects (since Logical Ring Contexts do
> > not have the same kind of backing objects).
> > 
> > No functional changes.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
> 
> The series looks fine. My gripe is that the split between context and
> ring is messy (I think that a context is now a view of the entire
> hardware state and so our bookkeeping should reflect that) and leads to
> some subtle bugs where the bookkeeping on the ring is not transferred
> correctly to the context. However, this series is a good starting point
> to fix the more esoteric problems.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Thanks for patches & review, all merged to dinq.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch