From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] intel-gpu-tools: Re-use
 igt_subtest_init for simple tests
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 17:42:47 +0100
Message-ID: <20140709164247.GF341@strange.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1403878537-29020-1-git-send-email-tim.gore@intel.com>
 <1403878537-29020-3-git-send-email-tim.gore@intel.com>
 <20140707160937.GL5821@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <8FCC70911F3E9548866CA0E51893BCC31A1CDD53@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20140709142350.GX17271@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1066E322
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Wed,  9 Jul 2014 09:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140709142350.GX17271@phenom.ffwll.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:23:50PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> For me the only trouble with this disdinction is that people consistently
> place tests in the wrong Makefile target. Hence I'd like to see those two
> Makefile targets being unified (which requires adjustements in piglit,
> too) to validate this work. Iirc Thomas is also working on this.

In all generalities, I think it makes things a lot simpler if we only
one case to care about. In this instance:

  "A test is a set of one or more subtests"

Seems a good invariant to me. Not sure I understand what the objections
are.

-- 
Damien