From: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915: State readout support for WRPLLs
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:35:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140710143535.GI3191@strange.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404484059-4236-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 11:27:39AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>
> Still tacked onto the side, but slowly getting there.
>
> v2: Don't forget the debugfs file.
>
> v3 (from Paulo): Don't forget to check the power domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
As always, there's nothing replacing testing:
for v3: Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
--
Damien
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 9 +++++++++
> 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index e79ddbf..7d72768 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2409,6 +2409,7 @@ static int i915_shared_dplls_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> seq_printf(m, " dpll_md: 0x%08x\n", pll->hw_state.dpll_md);
> seq_printf(m, " fp0: 0x%08x\n", pll->hw_state.fp0);
> seq_printf(m, " fp1: 0x%08x\n", pll->hw_state.fp1);
> + seq_printf(m, " wrpll: 0x%08x\n", pll->hw_state.wrpll);
> }
> drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 2ec7cb6..c1fa561 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ struct intel_dpll_hw_state {
> uint32_t dpll_md;
> uint32_t fp0;
> uint32_t fp1;
> + uint32_t wrpll;
> };
>
> struct intel_shared_dpll {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 3d61a53..654417e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -5900,6 +5900,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
> /* WRPLL */
> #define WRPLL_CTL1 0x46040
> #define WRPLL_CTL2 0x46060
> +#define WRPLL_CTL(pll) (pll == 0 ? WRPLL_CTL1 : WRPLL_CTL2)
> #define WRPLL_PLL_ENABLE (1<<31)
> #define WRPLL_PLL_SSC (1<<28)
> #define WRPLL_PLL_NON_SSC (2<<28)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index fae73d3..79cbb5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -790,6 +790,8 @@ bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
> intel_crtc->config.ddi_pll_sel = PORT_CLK_SEL_WRPLL2;
> intel_crtc->config.shared_dpll = DPLL_ID_WRPLL2;
> }
> +
> + intel_crtc->config.dpll_hw_state.wrpll = val;
> }
>
> return true;
> @@ -1315,6 +1317,21 @@ int intel_ddi_get_cdclk_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> }
> }
>
> +static bool hsw_ddi_pll_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll,
> + struct intel_dpll_hw_state *hw_state)
> +{
> + uint32_t val;
> +
> + if (!intel_display_power_enabled(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS))
> + return false;
> +
> + val = I915_READ(WRPLL_CTL(pll->id));
> + hw_state->wrpll = val;
> +
> + return val & WRPLL_PLL_ENABLE;
> +}
> +
> static char *hsw_ddi_pll_names[] = {
> "WRPLL 1",
> "WRPLL 2",
> @@ -1333,6 +1350,8 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> dev_priv->shared_dplls[i].id = i;
> dev_priv->shared_dplls[i].name = hsw_ddi_pll_names[i];
> + dev_priv->shared_dplls[i].get_hw_state =
> + hsw_ddi_pll_get_hw_state;
> }
>
> /* The LCPLL register should be turned on by the BIOS. For now let's
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 1d919ae..594a49f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -7587,6 +7587,7 @@ static void haswell_get_ddi_port_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> enum port port;
> uint32_t tmp;
>
> @@ -7605,6 +7606,13 @@ static void haswell_get_ddi_port_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> break;
> }
>
> + if (pipe_config->shared_dpll >= 0) {
> + pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[pipe_config->shared_dpll];
> +
> + WARN_ON(!pll->get_hw_state(dev_priv, pll,
> + &pipe_config->dpll_hw_state));
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Haswell has only FDI/PCH transcoder A. It is which is connected to
> * DDI E. So just check whether this pipe is wired to DDI E and whether
> @@ -10436,6 +10444,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(struct drm_device *dev,
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.dpll_md);
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.fp0);
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.fp1);
> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.wrpll);
>
> if (IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5)
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pipe_bpp);
> --
> 2.0.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-10 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-25 19:01 [PATCH 00/19] ddi: respin of runtime PM for DPMS Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915: Check hw state in assert_can_disable_lcpll Imre Deak
2014-06-30 20:59 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915: Remove spll_refcount for hsw Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915: Clean up WRPLL/SPLL #defines Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915: ddi: move pch setup after encoder->pre_enable Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915: ddi: move pch cleanup before encoder->post_disable Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915: Move the SPLL enabling into hsw_crt_pre_enable Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915: Move SPLL disabling into hsw_crt_post_disable Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915: Add a debugfs file for the shared dpll state Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915: Move ddi_pll_sel into the pipe config Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915: State readout and cross-checking for ddi_pll_sel Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915: Precompute static ddi_pll_sel values in encoders Imre Deak
2014-07-02 17:17 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-07-04 14:26 ` [PATCH 10.5/19] drm/i915: BDW also has special-purpose DP DDI clocks Paulo Zanoni
2014-07-04 14:26 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915: Precompute static ddi_pll_sel values in encoders Paulo Zanoni
2014-07-04 14:30 ` [PATCH 10.5/19] drm/i915: BDW also has special-purpose DP DDI clocks Damien Lespiau
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915: Basic shared dpll support for WRPLLs Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915: Document that the pll->mode_set hook is optional Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:01 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915: State readout support for WRPLLs Imre Deak
2014-07-04 14:27 ` [PATCH 13.5/19] drm/i915: add POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS Paulo Zanoni
2014-07-04 14:27 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915: State readout support for WRPLLs Paulo Zanoni
2014-07-10 14:35 ` Damien Lespiau [this message]
2014-07-10 14:33 ` [PATCH 13.5/19] drm/i915: add POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS Damien Lespiau
2014-06-25 19:02 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915: ->disable hook for WRPLLs Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:02 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915: ->enable " Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:02 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915: Switch to common shared dpll framework " Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:02 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915: Only touch WRPLL hw state in enable/disable hooks Imre Deak
2014-06-25 19:02 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915: ddi: enable runtime pm during dpms Imre Deak
2014-07-01 21:33 ` [PATCH 00/19] ddi: respin of runtime PM for DPMS Paulo Zanoni
2014-07-10 20:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-11 15:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-04 14:30 ` [PATCH 20/19] drm/i915: don't skip shared DPLL assertion on LPT Paulo Zanoni
2014-07-10 14:40 ` Damien Lespiau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140710143535.GI3191@strange.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=damien.lespiau@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox