From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Lespiau Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 00/43] Rotation test Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:19:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20140711141912.GE8230@strange.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1405015244-11370-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3948F6E00E for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 07:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1405015244-11370-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: sagar.a.kamble@intel.com List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:00:01PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > I've taken the current rotation test to test the kernel patches and improved it > a bit along the way. It's a bit like a detailed review, but with patches > instead of comments. > > With the rotation kernel patches and an IVB machine, that test now passes. > > Part of the motivation has been to augment the igt_kms framework to deal with > properties. Another reason include the number of lines we need to write for a > test. This series brings down that number from 325 to 129, something I can live > with. Whole series (but one patch after Daniel's comment) pushed to i-g-t after Chris and Daniel ack on IRC. This shouldn't blow up too hard, the test correctly skips when the kernel support is lacking. -- Damien