From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Lespiau Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Low hanging fruit to reduce the driver size Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 12:11:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20140712111145.GA24829@strange.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1405100054-5974-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> <20140712110142.GU17271@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7A66E2AD for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 04:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140712110142.GU17271@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:01:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > And I'm really not terribly convinced that kb shaving is worth the effort > overall, especially if it comes at a fairly steep maintainance burden of > piles of new config options and #defines. I wanted to try, I tried, probably not worth it, next! -- Damien