From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/43] drm/i915/bdw: Make sure gpu reset
 still works with Execlists
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:46:24 +0100
Message-ID: <20140801144624.GO8840@strange.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1406217891-8912-1-git-send-email-thomas.daniel@intel.com>
 <1406217891-8912-35-git-send-email-thomas.daniel@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8666E78D
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Fri,  1 Aug 2014 07:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1406217891-8912-35-git-send-email-thomas.daniel@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Thomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:04:42PM +0100, Thomas Daniel wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 3188403..6e604c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1587,6 +1587,7 @@ static int intel_init_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	ring->dev = dev;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->active_list);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->request_list);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->execlist_queue);

It's also a bit weird to now have sites where we initialize this list.
or I'm missing something?

-- 
Damien