From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Android sync points for i915 v2
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 09:32:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140805093204.09a08d20@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uGbCbhT17cM2ZgN_3io2Up_-Kw_-k7h_B-8mGzojheCCg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014 18:08:16 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> > But yes, I want the Android guys to try this out too. I've already
> > pinged them internally to check things out. Probably the biggest
> > remaining opens there would be having a timeline for the display side
> > of things too that covers vblank and page flip events as fences in a
> > separate namespace.
> >
> > Which makes me think going back to just using the Android structs
> > directly might be easier...
>
> Why that? They should really just provide the userspace interface on top ...
Because the internal implementation has the nice timeline/sync pt/fence
abstraction. It just fits nicely, conceptually, with the various
timelines we have in gfx.
For fences, I guess we'll need separate fence contexts for display and
the rings. And we can still combine them with the sync_fence api, so
it should be equivalent. I'm just still thinking in terms of the
Android bits and not the struct fence bits; I'll probably come around
eventually.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-05 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-31 18:58 [RFC] Sync points/fences for i915 Jesse Barnes
2014-07-31 18:58 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Android sync points " Jesse Barnes
2014-08-01 6:23 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04 23:18 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Android sync points for i915 v2 Jesse Barnes
2014-08-05 7:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-05 14:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-08-05 15:00 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-05 15:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-05 16:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-08-05 16:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-05 16:32 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2014-08-05 17:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-08-05 17:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-05 17:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-08-05 8:09 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-05 15:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-08-05 15:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-01 9:04 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Android sync points for i915 Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-08-01 16:02 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140805093204.09a08d20@jbarnes-desktop \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox