From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Revert "drm/i915: Enable semaphores on BDW"
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 09:10:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140808071000.GI8727@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABVU7+vTNVKW+QHmVV8omVqFM9563ETb-OiqXeBm8h=a3x97nQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 01:05:52PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> The rest of the series was a reference for the records of what I had and
> let semaphores on bdw a bit more stable. But even with them we still get
> hungs so please consider only to get the revert for now.
Thanks for the reminder, picked up for -fixes, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This reverts commit 521e62e49a42661a4ee0102644517dbe2f100a23.
> >
> > Although POST_SYNC brought a bit of stability to Semaphores on BDW
> > it didn't solved all issues and some hungs can still occour when
> > semaphores are enabled on BDW. Also some sloweness can be found on some
> > igt tests, althoguth it apparently doesn't affect real workloads.
> >
> > Besides that, no real performance gain was found on our tests with
> > different
> > and even multiple workloads.
> >
> > Let's disable it again for now. At least until we are sure it is safe
> > to re-enable it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > index 6c4b25c..ec96f9a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > @@ -481,6 +481,10 @@ bool i915_semaphore_is_enabled(struct drm_device *dev)
> > if (i915.semaphores >= 0)
> > return i915.semaphores;
> >
> > + /* Until we get further testing... */
> > + if (IS_GEN8(dev))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
> > /* Enable semaphores on SNB when IO remapping is off */
> > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 6 && intel_iommu_gfx_mapped)
> > --
> > 1.9.3
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rodrigo Vivi
> Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-08 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-04 18:15 [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/bdw: Always issue a force restore Rodrigo Vivi
2014-08-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Add thread stall DOP clock gating workaround on Broadwell Rodrigo Vivi
2014-08-05 17:10 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-08-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/bdw: MI_FLUSH_DW a qword instead of dword Rodrigo Vivi
2014-08-05 1:21 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-08-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/bdw: cs-stall before state cache invld w/a Rodrigo Vivi
2014-08-05 12:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-08-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: avoid emiting semaphore wait on GEN8 when seqno wrap happened Rodrigo Vivi
2014-08-05 8:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: BDW Semaphore signal with Post Sync Rodrigo Vivi
2014-08-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 7/7] Revert "drm/i915: Enable semaphores on BDW" Rodrigo Vivi
2014-08-07 20:05 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-08-08 7:10 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-08-08 7:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-08 7:31 ` Chris Wilson
2014-08-05 1:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/bdw: Always issue a force restore Ben Widawsky
2014-08-05 8:41 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140808071000.GI8727@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox