From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix lock dropping in intel_tv_detect() Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:16:12 +0300 Message-ID: <20140902081612.GH4193@intel.com> References: <20140901085022.GB11648@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> <1409566060-21337-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <20140901102009.GD11648@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> <20140901103637.GB4193@intel.com> <20140901104356.GE11648@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> <87egvuii5q.fsf@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0C06E41C for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87egvuii5q.fsf@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Jani Nikula Cc: David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tibor Billes List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:41:05AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:36:37PM +0300, Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:20:09AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:07:40PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.= com wrote: > >> > > From: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 > >> > > = > >> > > When intel_tv_detect() fails to do load detection it would forget = to > >> > > drop the locks and clean up the acquire context. Fix it up. > >> > > = > >> > > This is a regression from: > >> > > commit 208bf9fdcd3575aa4a5d48b3e0295f7cdaf6fc44 > >> > > Author: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 > >> > > Date: Mon Aug 11 13:15:35 2014 +0300 > >> > > = > >> > > drm/i915: Fix locking for intel_enable_pipe_a() > >> > > = > >> > > v2: Make the code more readable (Chris) > >> > > = > >> > > Cc: Tibor Billes > >> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 > >> > = > >> > Hmm, if we use WARN_ON() you should init type. > >> = > >> type is always set in the branch that sets status=3Dconnected. > > > > Back to thinking about readability and making sure that the WARN_ON > > never happens with just a glance. Otherwise, the WARN_ON would be better > > as WARN_ON(unsigned)type >=3D last_tv_type); Or something. Anway, take > > your pick and slap my r-b on it. :) > = > Ville? I don't know anymore. Just kill the WARN_ON() if it makes things confusing? -- = Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 Intel OTC