From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/edid: Reduce horizontal timings for
 pixel replicated modes
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:08:05 +0300
Message-ID: <20140905080805.GP4193@intel.com>
References: <1408483281-28053-1-git-send-email-clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
 <20140826081009.GF15520@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <20140826081107.GG15520@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <20140901131227.GE4193@intel.com> <20140901131750.GF4193@intel.com>
 <5408AAF6.2070300@intel.com>
 <CAKMK7uF=eOhYYQ7Oq0nL2LRYRfZLT+yB-0njB7Ds+HY7cpxMHA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D5D6E7FA
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Fri,  5 Sep 2014 01:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uF=eOhYYQ7Oq0nL2LRYRfZLT+yB-0njB7Ds+HY7cpxMHA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:31:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Readding intel-gfx since this is interesting for everyone.
> =

> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>=
 wrote:
> > I will attempt to improve my patch submissions process. I also need to =
start
> > annotating version in the subject field as well.
> >
> > When using --in_reply_to=3D  do I just use the Message-ID: from the ori=
ginal
> > patch message header or do I use the Message-ID: from the reply asking =
for
> > the change?
> =

> Usually I reply to the previous patch version to avoid threads nesting
> too badly, but other people reply to the last review comment. It
> doesn't really matter.

I tend to do the latter, but I must admit the threads sometimes get
rather messy, so I think I'll change my ways. The changelog in the
patch should anyway keep the story together.

-- =

Ville Syrj=E4l=E4
Intel OTC