public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use anonymous union/struct to save space taken by latency values
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:33:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140910173328.GA4193@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409921592-23754-2-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:53:11PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>

I think I'll punt on reviewing this for now. I need to go through
the other skl wm stuff first, and then I probaly need to stare at the
result a bit before I can think about unification.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 0baf7f3..8471d12 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1730,23 +1730,27 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>  	struct vlv_s0ix_state vlv_s0ix_state;
>  
>  	struct {
> -		/*
> -		 * Raw watermark latency values:
> -		 * in 0.1us units for WM0,
> -		 * in 0.5us units for WM1+.
> -		 */
> -		/* primary */
> -		uint16_t pri_latency[5];
> -		/* sprite */
> -		uint16_t spr_latency[5];
> -		/* cursor */
> -		uint16_t cur_latency[5];
> -		/*
> -		 * Raw watermark memory latency values
> -		 * for SKL for all 8 levels
> -		 * in 1us units.
> -		 */
> -		uint16_t skl_latency[8];
> +		union {
> +			/*
> +			 * Raw watermark latency values:
> +			 * in 0.1us units for WM0,
> +			 * in 0.5us units for WM1+.
> +			 */
> +			struct {
> +				/* primary */
> +				uint16_t pri_latency[5];
> +				/* sprite */
> +				uint16_t spr_latency[5];
> +				/* cursor */
> +				uint16_t cur_latency[5];
> +			};
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Raw watermark memory latency values for SKL for all
> +			 * 8 levels. In 1us units.
> +			 */
> +			uint16_t skl_latency[8];
> +		};
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * The skl_wm_values structure is a bit too big for stack
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-10 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-05 12:53 [PATCH 0/2] Couple of patches on top of the SKL latency retrieval Damien Lespiau
2014-09-05 12:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use anonymous union/struct to save space taken by latency values Damien Lespiau
2014-09-10 17:33   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2014-09-05 12:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Clear PCODE_DATA1 on SNB+ Damien Lespiau
2014-09-10 17:32   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-11-04 19:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] Couple of patches on top of the SKL latency retrieval Rodrigo Vivi
2014-11-05 16:49   ` Damien Lespiau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140910173328.GA4193@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=damien.lespiau@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox