From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Cc: Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: Re: [RFC 08/25] drm/i915: Remove 'outstanding_lazy_seqno'
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 15:05:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141019130531.GY26941@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412941102-5098-1-git-send-email-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:38:22PM +0100, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>
> For: VIZ-4377
> Signed-off-by: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
This looks like a v2 of the previous patch 08, but the commit message
fails to mention what exactly changed and why.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 13 +++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 26 +++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 52 +++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 13 ++-----
> 6 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 9ce0808..c884188 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ i915_gem_check_olr(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, u32 seqno)
> BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&ring->dev->struct_mutex));
>
> ret = 0;
> - if (seqno == ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno)
> + if (seqno == i915_gem_request_get_seqno(ring->outstanding_lazy_request))
> ret = i915_add_request(ring, NULL);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -2344,7 +2344,7 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> u32 request_ring_position, request_start;
> int ret;
>
> - request = ring->preallocated_lazy_request;
> + request = ring->outstanding_lazy_request;
> if (WARN_ON(request == NULL))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -2391,7 +2391,6 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>
> i915_gem_request_reference(request);
>
> - request->seqno = intel_ring_get_seqno(ring);
> request->ring = ring;
> request->head = request_start;
> request->tail = request_ring_position;
> @@ -2428,8 +2427,7 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> }
>
> trace_i915_gem_request_add(ring, request->seqno);
> - ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno = 0;
> - ring->preallocated_lazy_request = NULL;
> + ring->outstanding_lazy_request = NULL;
>
> if (!dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended) {
> i915_queue_hangcheck(ring->dev);
> @@ -2605,9 +2603,8 @@ static void i915_gem_reset_ring_cleanup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> /* These may not have been flush before the reset, do so now */
> - kfree(ring->preallocated_lazy_request);
> - ring->preallocated_lazy_request = NULL;
> - ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno = 0;
> + kfree(ring->outstanding_lazy_request);
> + ring->outstanding_lazy_request = NULL;
> }
>
> void i915_gem_restore_fences(struct drm_device *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 4250211..e0fdfae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - trace_i915_gem_ring_dispatch(ring, intel_ring_get_seqno(ring), flags);
> + trace_i915_gem_ring_dispatch(ring, i915_gem_request_get_seqno(intel_ring_get_request(ring)), flags);
>
> i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_active(vmas, ring);
> i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands(dev, file, ring, batch_obj);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 5aae3d1e..6da18c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -10053,7 +10053,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> if (ret)
> goto cleanup_unpin;
>
> - work->flip_queued_seqno = intel_ring_get_seqno(ring);
> + work->flip_queued_seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(intel_ring_get_request(ring));
> work->flip_queued_ring = ring;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index b5b6430..55c607a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -793,22 +793,14 @@ void intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf)
> execlists_context_queue(ring, ctx, ringbuf->tail);
> }
>
> -static int logical_ring_alloc_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> - struct intel_context *ctx)
> +static int logical_ring_alloc_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> + struct intel_context *ctx)
> {
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> int ret;
>
> - /* The aim is to replace seqno values with request structures. A step
> - * along the way is to switch to using the PLR in preference to the
> - * OLS. That requires the PLR to only be valid when the OLS is also
> - * valid. I.e., the two must be kept in step. */
> -
> - if (ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno) {
> - BUG_ON(ring->preallocated_lazy_request == NULL);
> + if (ring->outstanding_lazy_request)
> return 0;
> - }
> - BUG_ON(ring->preallocated_lazy_request != NULL);
>
> request = kmalloc(sizeof(*request), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (request == NULL)
> @@ -816,7 +808,7 @@ static int logical_ring_alloc_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>
> kref_init(&request->ref);
>
> - ret = i915_gem_get_seqno(ring->dev, &ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> + ret = i915_gem_get_seqno(ring->dev, &request->seqno);
> if (ret) {
> kfree(request);
> return ret;
> @@ -829,7 +821,7 @@ static int logical_ring_alloc_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> request->ctx = ctx;
> i915_gem_context_reference(request->ctx);
>
> - ring->preallocated_lazy_request = request;
> + ring->outstanding_lazy_request = request;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -997,7 +989,7 @@ int intel_logical_ring_begin(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf, int num_dwords)
> return ret;
>
> /* Preallocate the olr before touching the ring */
> - ret = logical_ring_alloc_seqno(ring, ringbuf->FIXME_lrc_ctx);
> + ret = logical_ring_alloc_request(ring, ringbuf->FIXME_lrc_ctx);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1212,7 +1204,8 @@ static int gen8_emit_request(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf)
> (ring->status_page.gfx_addr +
> (I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX << MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX_SHIFT)));
> intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0);
> - intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> + intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf,
> + i915_gem_request_get_seqno(ring->outstanding_lazy_request));
> intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_USER_INTERRUPT);
> intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_NOOP);
> intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(ringbuf);
> @@ -1235,8 +1228,7 @@ void intel_logical_ring_cleanup(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>
> intel_logical_ring_stop(ring);
> WARN_ON((I915_READ_MODE(ring) & MODE_IDLE) == 0);
> - ring->preallocated_lazy_request = NULL;
> - ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno = 0;
> + ring->outstanding_lazy_request = NULL;
>
> if (ring->cleanup)
> ring->cleanup(ring);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 7350f78..99544bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -895,17 +895,20 @@ static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct intel_engine_cs *signaller,
> return ret;
>
> for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) {
> + u32 seqno;
> u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i];
> if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID)
> continue;
>
> + seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(
> + signaller->outstanding_lazy_request);
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6));
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB |
> PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE |
> PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE);
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset));
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset));
> - intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> + intel_ring_emit(signaller, seqno);
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0);
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL |
> MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id));
> @@ -933,16 +936,19 @@ static int gen8_xcs_signal(struct intel_engine_cs *signaller,
> return ret;
>
> for_each_ring(waiter, dev_priv, i) {
> + u32 seqno;
> u64 gtt_offset = signaller->semaphore.signal_ggtt[i];
> if (gtt_offset == MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID)
> continue;
>
> + seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(
> + signaller->outstanding_lazy_request);
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, (MI_FLUSH_DW + 1) |
> MI_FLUSH_DW_OP_STOREDW);
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, lower_32_bits(gtt_offset) |
> MI_FLUSH_DW_USE_GTT);
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset));
> - intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> + intel_ring_emit(signaller, seqno);
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL |
> MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id));
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0);
> @@ -971,9 +977,11 @@ static int gen6_signal(struct intel_engine_cs *signaller,
> for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) {
> u32 mbox_reg = signaller->semaphore.mbox.signal[i];
> if (mbox_reg != GEN6_NOSYNC) {
> + u32 seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(
> + signaller->outstanding_lazy_request);
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
> intel_ring_emit(signaller, mbox_reg);
> - intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> + intel_ring_emit(signaller, seqno);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1008,7 +1016,8 @@ gen6_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>
> intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX);
> intel_ring_emit(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX << MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX_SHIFT);
> - intel_ring_emit(ring, ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring,
> + i915_gem_request_get_seqno(ring->outstanding_lazy_request));
> intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_USER_INTERRUPT);
> __intel_ring_advance(ring);
>
> @@ -1126,7 +1135,8 @@ pc_render_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> PIPE_CONTROL_WRITE_FLUSH |
> PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE);
> intel_ring_emit(ring, ring->scratch.gtt_offset | PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT);
> - intel_ring_emit(ring, ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring,
> + i915_gem_request_get_seqno(ring->outstanding_lazy_request));
> intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
> PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH(ring, scratch_addr);
> scratch_addr += 2 * CACHELINE_BYTES; /* write to separate cachelines */
> @@ -1145,7 +1155,8 @@ pc_render_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE |
> PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY);
> intel_ring_emit(ring, ring->scratch.gtt_offset | PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT);
> - intel_ring_emit(ring, ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring,
> + i915_gem_request_get_seqno(ring->outstanding_lazy_request));
> intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
> __intel_ring_advance(ring);
>
> @@ -1385,7 +1396,8 @@ i9xx_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>
> intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX);
> intel_ring_emit(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX << MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX_SHIFT);
> - intel_ring_emit(ring, ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring,
> + i915_gem_request_get_seqno(ring->outstanding_lazy_request));
> intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_USER_INTERRUPT);
> __intel_ring_advance(ring);
>
> @@ -1839,8 +1851,7 @@ void intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> WARN_ON(!IS_GEN2(ring->dev) && (I915_READ_MODE(ring) & MODE_IDLE) == 0);
>
> intel_destroy_ringbuffer_obj(ringbuf);
> - ring->preallocated_lazy_request = NULL;
> - ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno = 0;
> + ring->outstanding_lazy_request = NULL;
>
> if (ring->cleanup)
> ring->cleanup(ring);
> @@ -1980,7 +1991,7 @@ int intel_ring_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> int ret;
>
> /* We need to add any requests required to flush the objects and ring */
> - if (ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno) {
> + if (ring->outstanding_lazy_request) {
> ret = i915_add_request(ring, NULL);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -1998,22 +2009,13 @@ int intel_ring_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> }
>
> static int
> -intel_ring_alloc_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> +intel_ring_alloc_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> {
> int ret;
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
>
> - /* The aim is to replace seqno values with request structures. A step
> - * along the way is to switch to using the PLR in preference to the
> - * OLS. That requires the PLR to only be valid when the OLS is also
> - * valid. I.e., the two must be kept in step. */
> -
> - if (ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno) {
> - BUG_ON(ring->preallocated_lazy_request == NULL);
> + if (ring->outstanding_lazy_request)
> return 0;
> - }
> -
> - BUG_ON(ring->preallocated_lazy_request != NULL);
>
> request = kmalloc(sizeof(*request), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (request == NULL)
> @@ -2021,13 +2023,13 @@ intel_ring_alloc_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>
> kref_init(&request->ref);
>
> - ret = i915_gem_get_seqno(ring->dev, &ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> + ret = i915_gem_get_seqno(ring->dev, &request->seqno);
> if (ret) {
> kfree(request);
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ring->preallocated_lazy_request = request;
> + ring->outstanding_lazy_request = request;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2068,7 +2070,7 @@ int intel_ring_begin(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> return ret;
>
> /* Preallocate the olr before touching the ring */
> - ret = intel_ring_alloc_seqno(ring);
> + ret = intel_ring_alloc_request(ring);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -2103,7 +2105,7 @@ void intel_ring_init_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, u32 seqno)
> struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>
> - BUG_ON(ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> + BUG_ON(ring->outstanding_lazy_request);
>
> if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 6 || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 7) {
> I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_0(ring->mmio_base), 0);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index d98b964..98b219d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -265,8 +265,7 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
> /**
> * Do we have some not yet emitted requests outstanding?
> */
> - struct drm_i915_gem_request *preallocated_lazy_request;
> - u32 outstanding_lazy_seqno;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *outstanding_lazy_request;
> bool gpu_caches_dirty;
> bool fbc_dirty;
>
> @@ -429,17 +428,11 @@ static inline u32 intel_ring_get_tail(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf)
> return ringbuf->tail;
> }
>
> -static inline u32 intel_ring_get_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> -{
> - BUG_ON(ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno == 0);
> - return ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno;
> -}
> -
> static inline struct drm_i915_gem_request *
> intel_ring_get_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> {
> - BUG_ON(ring->preallocated_lazy_request == NULL);
> - return ring->preallocated_lazy_request;
> + BUG_ON(ring->outstanding_lazy_request == NULL);
> + return ring->outstanding_lazy_request;
> }
>
> static inline void i915_trace_irq_get(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, u32 seqno)
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-19 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-06 14:15 [RFC 00/21] Replace seqno values with request structures John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 01/21] Bug: missing i915_seqno_passed() call? John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 02/21] drm/i915: Remove redundant parameter to i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail() John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 03/21] drm/i915: Ensure OLS & PLR are always in sync John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 04/21] drm/i915: Add reference count to request structure John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 05/21] drm/i915: Add helper functions to aid seqno -> request transition John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 06/21] drm/i915: Replace last_[rwf]_seqno with last_[rwf]_req John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 07/21] drm/i915: Ensure requests stick around during waits John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 08/21] drm/i915: Remove 'outstanding_lazy_seqno' John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 09/21] drm/i915: Make 'i915_gem_check_olr' actually check by request not seqno John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 10/21] drm/i915: Convert 'last_flip_req' to be a request not a seqno John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 11/21] drm/i915: Convert i915_wait_seqno to i915_wait_request John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 12/21] drm/i915: Convert 'i915_add_request' to take a request not a seqno John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 13/21] drm/i915: Convert mmio_flip::seqno to struct request John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 14/21] drm/i915: Convert 'flip_queued_seqno' into 'flip_queued_request' John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 15/21] drm/i915: Convert most 'i915_seqno_passed' calls into 'i915_gem_request_completed' John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 16/21] drm/i915: Convert __wait_seqno() to __wait_request() John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 17/21] drm/i915: Convert trace functions from seqno to request John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 18/21] drm/i915: Convert 'trace_irq' to use requests rather than seqnos John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 19/21] drm/i915: Convert semaphores to handle requests not seqnos John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 20/21] drm/i915: Convert 'ring_idle()' to use " John.C.Harrison
2014-10-06 14:15 ` [RFC 21/21] drm/i915: Remove 'obj->ring' John.C.Harrison
2014-10-19 14:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-28 15:09 ` John Harrison
2014-11-03 10:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-19 14:09 ` [RFC 20/21] drm/i915: Convert 'ring_idle()' to use requests not seqnos Daniel Vetter
2014-10-28 14:03 ` John Harrison
2014-11-03 10:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-19 14:08 ` [RFC 19/21] drm/i915: Convert semaphores to handle " Daniel Vetter
2014-10-10 11:39 ` [RFC 16/25] drm/i915: Convert most 'i915_seqno_passed' calls into 'i915_gem_request_completed' John.C.Harrison
2014-10-19 14:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-28 14:02 ` John Harrison
2014-10-19 13:11 ` [RFC 14/21] drm/i915: Convert 'flip_queued_seqno' into 'flip_queued_request' Daniel Vetter
2014-10-19 13:07 ` [RFC 13/21] drm/i915: Convert mmio_flip::seqno to struct request Daniel Vetter
2014-10-19 12:57 ` [RFC 10/21] drm/i915: Convert 'last_flip_req' to be a request not a seqno Daniel Vetter
2014-10-19 12:55 ` [RFC 09/21] drm/i915: Make 'i915_gem_check_olr' actually check by request not seqno Daniel Vetter
2014-10-28 14:01 ` John Harrison
2014-11-03 10:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-10 11:38 ` [RFC 08/25] drm/i915: Remove 'outstanding_lazy_seqno' John.C.Harrison
2014-10-19 13:05 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-10-19 12:48 ` [RFC 08/21] " Daniel Vetter
2014-10-19 12:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-19 12:40 ` [RFC 06/21] drm/i915: Replace last_[rwf]_seqno with last_[rwf]_req Daniel Vetter
2014-10-20 15:58 ` John Harrison
2014-10-19 12:35 ` [RFC 05/21] drm/i915: Add helper functions to aid seqno -> request transition Daniel Vetter
2014-10-20 14:49 ` John Harrison
2014-10-19 12:32 ` [RFC 03/21] drm/i915: Ensure OLS & PLR are always in sync Daniel Vetter
2014-10-20 14:39 ` John Harrison
2014-10-19 12:25 ` [RFC 02/21] drm/i915: Remove redundant parameter to i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail() Daniel Vetter
2014-10-19 13:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-06 14:45 ` [RFC 01/21] Bug: missing i915_seqno_passed() call? Daniel Vetter
2014-10-06 14:59 ` John Harrison
2014-10-06 15:17 ` [RFC 00/21] Replace seqno values with request structures Chris Wilson
2014-10-19 17:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-20 7:19 ` Chris Wilson
2014-10-20 15:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-07 16:47 ` [RFC 22/21] drm/i915: Cache request completion status John.C.Harrison
2014-10-10 11:40 ` [RFC 23/25] " John.C.Harrison
2014-10-19 14:14 ` [RFC 22/21] " Daniel Vetter
2014-10-28 15:36 ` John Harrison
2014-11-03 10:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-10 11:38 ` [RFC 15/25] drm/i915: Connect requests to rings at creation not submission John.C.Harrison
2014-10-10 11:41 ` [RFC 24/25] drm/i915: Zero fill the request structure John.C.Harrison
2014-10-19 14:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-28 15:55 ` John Harrison
2014-11-03 11:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-10 11:41 ` [RFC 25/25] drm/i915: Defer seqno allocation until actual hardware submission time John.C.Harrison
2014-10-19 14:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-10 12:03 ` [RFC 00/21] Replace seqno values with request structures John Harrison
2014-10-19 14:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-20 10:19 ` John Harrison
2014-10-20 15:41 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141019130531.GY26941@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox