From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Add rotation support for cursor
 plane
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:49:16 +0200
Message-ID: <20141023084916.GC26941@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1410766511-18879-2-git-send-email-sonika.jindal@intel.com>
 <1410767028-19227-1-git-send-email-sonika.jindal@intel.com>
 <000C66961D35964B9714611E548C10AD0C0E9815@BGSMSX104.gar.corp.intel.com>
 <20141023002924.GV22350@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (mail-wg0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48286E446
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b13so593658wgh.24
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141023002924.GV22350@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, "Kamble, Sagar A" <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 05:29:24PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 08:43:46AM +0000, Jindal, Sonika wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Did anybody get a chance to look at this patch?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Sonika
> 
> Looks like we waited a bit too long and the codebase has evolved, so I
> needed to make some tweaks to your patches to get them to apply cleanly
> on the latest di-nightly.  However the overall changes here look good to
> me, and we don't seem to be missing any details from the bspec, so
> 
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> 
> After tweaking your patches to apply against the latest di-nightly, your
> i-g-t test runs properly for me on IVB, as well as another simple test I
> wrote myself, so you can also put
> 
> Tested-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> 
> Let me know if you want the rebased copies of the patches I used for
> testing.

Lazy maintainer here. That would be awesome ;-) Since you've frobbed the
patches a bit pls also put your sob onto them.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch