From: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] gem_bad_reloc: Don't flip-flop between SKIP and PASS
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:40:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141204164059.GD2640@strange.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141204161839.GE13586@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:18:39PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 01:58:54PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > Here is a cheap way for this test to give consistent results. This
> > doesn't change the usefulness of this test, hopefully.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/gem_bad_reloc.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/gem_bad_reloc.c b/tests/gem_bad_reloc.c
> > index df0100f..ef6b52a 100644
> > --- a/tests/gem_bad_reloc.c
> > +++ b/tests/gem_bad_reloc.c
> > @@ -87,7 +87,13 @@ static int negative_reloc(int fd, unsigned flags)
> > gem_close(fd, gem_exec[1].handle);
> >
> > igt_info("Found offset %ld for 4k batch\n", (long)gem_exec[0].offset);
> > - igt_require(gem_exec[0].offset < BIAS);
> > + /*
> > + * Ideally we'd like to be able to control where the kernel is going to
> > + * place the buffer. We don't SKIP here because it causes the test
> > + * to "randomly" flip-flop between the SKIP and PASS states.
> > + */
>
> Riddle me thus: the test scripts try to ensure that every test run has
> the identical environment. Yet between runs we have different layouts of
> framebuffer objects...
>
> To improve this test, what you could actually try is disabling all
> CRTCs. That should give consistent results.
I actually didn't manage to reproduce the erratic behaviour described in
the bug. So maybe we've already fixed what caused the flip-flopping in
the first place. Or maybe I can't reproduce it because I'm running in a
clean environment wihout having run a few dozen kms tests beforehand.
In any case, I'd rather go for the quick option that doesn't make the
worse in a too awful way and is won't regress (it's also less work, I'm
lazy).
--
Damien
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-04 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 13:58 [PATCH i-g-t] gem_bad_reloc: Don't flip-flop between SKIP and PASS Damien Lespiau
2014-12-04 14:05 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-12-04 16:18 ` Chris Wilson
2014-12-04 16:40 ` Damien Lespiau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141204164059.GD2640@strange.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=damien.lespiau@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox