From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Add debugfs entry for DRRS
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 01:39:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150224003908.GL24485@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424693154-25942-1-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:35:54PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> From: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
>
> Adding a debugfs entry to determine if DRRS is supported or not
>
> V2: [By Ram]: Following details about the active crtc will be filled
> in seq-file of the debugfs
> 1. Encoder output type
> 2. DRRS Support on this CRTC
> 3. DRRS current state
> 4. Current Vrefresh
> Format is as follows:
> CRTC 1: Output: eDP, DRRS Supported: Yes (Seamless), DRRS_State: DRRS_HIGH_RR, Vrefresh: 60
> CRTC 2: Output: HDMI, DRRS Supported : No, VBT DRRS_type: Seamless
> CRTC 1: Output: eDP, DRRS Supported: Yes (Seamless), DRRS_State: DRRS_LOW_RR, Vrefresh: 40
> CRTC 2: Output: HDMI, DRRS Supported : No, VBT DRRS_type: Seamless
>
> V3: [By Ram]: Readability is improved.
> Another error case is covered [Daniel]
>
> V4: [By Ram]: Current status of the Idleness DRRS along with
> the Front buffer bits are added to the debugfs. [Rodrigo]
>
> V5: [By Ram]: Rephrased to make it easy to understand.
> And format is modified. [Rodrigo]
>
> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Total absence of locking while walking modesetting structures is a bit
uncool.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 164fa82..e51001c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2869,6 +2869,118 @@ static int i915_ddb_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void drrs_status_per_crtc(struct seq_file *m,
> + struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
> +{
> + struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct i915_drrs *drrs = &dev_priv->drrs;
> + int vrefresh = 0;
> + u32 work_status;
> +
> + for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &intel_crtc->base, intel_encoder) {
> + /* Encoder connected on this CRTC */
> + switch (intel_encoder->type) {
> + case INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP:
> + seq_puts(m, "eDP:\n");
> + break;
> + case INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI:
> + seq_puts(m, "DSI:\n");
> + break;
> + case INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI:
> + seq_puts(m, "HDMI:\n");
> + break;
> + case INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT:
> + seq_puts(m, "DP:\n");
> + break;
> + default:
> + seq_printf(m, "Other encoder (id=%d).\n",
> + intel_encoder->type);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type == STATIC_DRRS_SUPPORT)
> + seq_puts(m, "\tVBT: DRRS_type: Static");
> + else if (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type == SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT)
> + seq_puts(m, "\tVBT: DRRS_type: Seamless");
> + else if (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type == DRRS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> + seq_puts(m, "\tVBT: DRRS_type: None");
> + else
> + seq_puts(m, "\tVBT: DRRS_type: FIXME: Unrecognized Value");
> +
> + seq_puts(m, "\n\n");
> +
> + if (intel_crtc->config->has_drrs) {
> + struct intel_panel *panel;
> +
> + panel = &drrs->dp->attached_connector->panel;
Same here, chasing drrs pointers without grabbing the right locks isn't
awesome either. I've merged all the other patches in this series to dinq.
-Daniel
> + /* DRRS Supported */
> + seq_puts(m, "\tDRRS Supported: Yes\n");
> + seq_printf(m, "\t\tBusy_frontbuffer_bits: 0x%X",
> + drrs->busy_frontbuffer_bits);
> +
> + seq_puts(m, "\n\t\t");
> + work_status = work_busy(&drrs->work.work);
> + if (drrs->busy_frontbuffer_bits) {
> + seq_puts(m, "Front buffer: Busy.\n");
> + seq_puts(m, "\t\tIdleness DRRS: Disabled");
> + } else {
> + seq_puts(m, "Front buffer: Idle");
> + seq_puts(m, "\n\t\t");
> + if (drrs->refresh_rate_type == DRRS_HIGH_RR) {
> + if (work_status)
> + seq_puts(m, "Idleness DRRS: Enabled");
> + else
> + seq_puts(m, "Idleness DRRS: Disabled");
> + } else if (drrs->refresh_rate_type == DRRS_LOW_RR) {
> + seq_puts(m, "Idleness DRRS: Enabled");
> + }
> + }
> +
> + seq_puts(m, "\n\t\t");
> + if (drrs->refresh_rate_type == DRRS_HIGH_RR) {
> + seq_puts(m, "DRRS_State: DRRS_HIGH_RR\n");
> + vrefresh = panel->fixed_mode->vrefresh;
> + } else if (drrs->refresh_rate_type == DRRS_LOW_RR) {
> + seq_puts(m, "DRRS_State: DRRS_LOW_RR\n");
> + vrefresh = panel->downclock_mode->vrefresh;
> + } else {
> + seq_printf(m, "DRRS_State: Unknown(%d)\n",
> + drrs->refresh_rate_type);
> + return;
> + }
> + seq_printf(m, "\t\tVrefresh: %d", vrefresh);
> +
> + } else {
> + /* DRRS not supported. Print the VBT parameter*/
> + seq_puts(m, "\tDRRS Supported : No");
> + }
> + seq_puts(m, "\n");
> +}
> +
> +static int i915_drrs_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> +{
> + struct drm_info_node *node = m->private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev;
> + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
> + int active_crtc_cnt = 0;
> +
> + for_each_intel_crtc(dev, intel_crtc) {
> + if (intel_crtc->active) {
> + active_crtc_cnt++;
> + seq_printf(m, "\nCRTC %d: ", active_crtc_cnt);
> +
> + drrs_status_per_crtc(m, dev, intel_crtc);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!active_crtc_cnt)
> + seq_puts(m, "No active crtc found\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> struct pipe_crc_info {
> const char *name;
> struct drm_device *dev;
> @@ -4483,6 +4595,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = {
> {"i915_dp_mst_info", i915_dp_mst_info, 0},
> {"i915_wa_registers", i915_wa_registers, 0},
> {"i915_ddb_info", i915_ddb_info, 0},
> + {"i915_drrs_status", i915_drrs_status, 0},
> };
> #define I915_DEBUGFS_ENTRIES ARRAY_SIZE(i915_debugfs_list)
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-13 10:02 [PATCH 0/6] eDP DRRS based on frontbuffer tracking Ramalingam C
2015-02-13 10:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Add support for DRRS in intel_dp_set_m_n Ramalingam C
2015-02-19 17:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-13 10:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/bdw: Add support for DRRS to switch RR Ramalingam C
2015-02-19 17:25 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-20 6:15 ` Ramalingam C
2015-02-20 18:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-13 10:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Support for RR switching on VLV Ramalingam C
2015-02-13 10:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Enable eDP DRRS for CHV Ramalingam C
2015-02-19 18:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-13 10:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] Documentation/drm: DocBook integration for DRRS Ramalingam C
2015-02-13 10:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Add debugfs entry " Ramalingam C
2015-02-19 18:45 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-20 14:37 ` Ramalingam C
2015-02-23 12:05 ` [PATCH] " Ramalingam C
2015-02-23 18:19 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-03-03 12:20 ` Ramalingam C
2015-02-24 0:39 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-02-27 13:59 ` Ramalingam C
2015-03-03 15:23 ` Ramalingam C
2015-03-04 23:00 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-03-05 11:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-05 11:22 ` Ramalingam C
2015-03-05 13:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-23 12:08 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Enhancing eDP DRRS debug message Ramalingam C
2015-02-23 18:20 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 0:51 ` [PATCH 0/6] eDP DRRS based on frontbuffer tracking Daniel Vetter
2015-02-27 14:29 ` Ramalingam C
2015-02-27 15:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-01 8:24 ` Ramalingam C
2015-03-03 6:41 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Fixing mutex deadlock window at eDP DRRS Ramalingam C
2015-03-04 22:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-03-05 11:49 ` Daniel Vetter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-21 12:26 [PATCH 9/10] drm/i915: Add debugfs entry for DRRS Ramalingam C
2015-01-22 16:45 ` [PATCH] " Ramalingam C
2015-01-23 16:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-23 17:47 ` Ramalingam C
2015-01-23 17:52 ` Ramalingam C
2015-01-24 0:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-11 12:52 ` Ramalingam C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150224003908.GL24485@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox