public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Add debugfs entry for DRRS
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 01:39:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150224003908.GL24485@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424693154-25942-1-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:35:54PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> From: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
> 
> Adding a debugfs entry to determine if DRRS is supported or not
> 
> V2: [By Ram]: Following details about the active crtc will be filled
> 	in seq-file of the debugfs
> 	1. Encoder output type
> 	2. DRRS Support on this CRTC
> 	3. DRRS current state
> 	4. Current Vrefresh
> Format is as follows:
> CRTC 1:  Output: eDP, DRRS Supported: Yes (Seamless), DRRS_State: DRRS_HIGH_RR, Vrefresh: 60
> CRTC 2:  Output: HDMI, DRRS Supported : No, VBT DRRS_type: Seamless
> CRTC 1:  Output: eDP, DRRS Supported: Yes (Seamless), DRRS_State: DRRS_LOW_RR, Vrefresh: 40
> CRTC 2:  Output: HDMI, DRRS Supported : No, VBT DRRS_type: Seamless
> 
> V3: [By Ram]: Readability is improved.
> 	Another error case is covered [Daniel]
> 
> V4: [By Ram]: Current status of the Idleness DRRS along with
> 	the Front buffer bits are added to the debugfs. [Rodrigo]
> 
> V5: [By Ram]: Rephrased to make it easy to understand.
> 	And format is modified. [Rodrigo]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>

Total absence of locking while walking modesetting structures is a bit
uncool.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c |  113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 113 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 164fa82..e51001c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2869,6 +2869,118 @@ static int i915_ddb_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void drrs_status_per_crtc(struct seq_file *m,
> +		struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
> +{
> +	struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +	struct i915_drrs *drrs = &dev_priv->drrs;
> +	int vrefresh = 0;
> +	u32 work_status;
> +
> +	for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &intel_crtc->base, intel_encoder) {
> +		/* Encoder connected on this CRTC */
> +		switch (intel_encoder->type) {
> +		case INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP:
> +			seq_puts(m, "eDP:\n");
> +			break;
> +		case INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI:
> +			seq_puts(m, "DSI:\n");
> +			break;
> +		case INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI:
> +			seq_puts(m, "HDMI:\n");
> +			break;
> +		case INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT:
> +			seq_puts(m, "DP:\n");
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			seq_printf(m, "Other encoder (id=%d).\n",
> +						intel_encoder->type);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type == STATIC_DRRS_SUPPORT)
> +		seq_puts(m, "\tVBT: DRRS_type: Static");
> +	else if (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type == SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT)
> +		seq_puts(m, "\tVBT: DRRS_type: Seamless");
> +	else if (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type == DRRS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> +		seq_puts(m, "\tVBT: DRRS_type: None");
> +	else
> +		seq_puts(m, "\tVBT: DRRS_type: FIXME: Unrecognized Value");
> +
> +	seq_puts(m, "\n\n");
> +
> +	if (intel_crtc->config->has_drrs) {
> +		struct intel_panel *panel;
> +
> +		panel = &drrs->dp->attached_connector->panel;

Same here, chasing drrs pointers without grabbing the right locks isn't
awesome either. I've merged all the other patches in this series to dinq.
-Daniel

> +		/* DRRS Supported */
> +		seq_puts(m, "\tDRRS Supported: Yes\n");
> +		seq_printf(m, "\t\tBusy_frontbuffer_bits: 0x%X",
> +					drrs->busy_frontbuffer_bits);
> +
> +		seq_puts(m, "\n\t\t");
> +		work_status = work_busy(&drrs->work.work);
> +		if (drrs->busy_frontbuffer_bits) {
> +			seq_puts(m, "Front buffer: Busy.\n");
> +			seq_puts(m, "\t\tIdleness DRRS: Disabled");
> +		} else {
> +			seq_puts(m, "Front buffer: Idle");
> +			seq_puts(m, "\n\t\t");
> +			if (drrs->refresh_rate_type == DRRS_HIGH_RR) {
> +				if (work_status)
> +					seq_puts(m, "Idleness DRRS: Enabled");
> +				else
> +					seq_puts(m, "Idleness DRRS: Disabled");
> +			} else if (drrs->refresh_rate_type == DRRS_LOW_RR) {
> +				seq_puts(m, "Idleness DRRS: Enabled");
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		seq_puts(m, "\n\t\t");
> +		if (drrs->refresh_rate_type == DRRS_HIGH_RR) {
> +			seq_puts(m, "DRRS_State: DRRS_HIGH_RR\n");
> +			vrefresh = panel->fixed_mode->vrefresh;
> +		} else if (drrs->refresh_rate_type == DRRS_LOW_RR) {
> +			seq_puts(m, "DRRS_State: DRRS_LOW_RR\n");
> +			vrefresh = panel->downclock_mode->vrefresh;
> +		} else {
> +			seq_printf(m, "DRRS_State: Unknown(%d)\n",
> +						drrs->refresh_rate_type);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +		seq_printf(m, "\t\tVrefresh: %d", vrefresh);
> +
> +	} else {
> +		/* DRRS not supported. Print the VBT parameter*/
> +		seq_puts(m, "\tDRRS Supported : No");
> +	}
> +	seq_puts(m, "\n");
> +}
> +
> +static int i915_drrs_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> +{
> +	struct drm_info_node *node = m->private;
> +	struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev;
> +	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
> +	int active_crtc_cnt = 0;
> +
> +	for_each_intel_crtc(dev, intel_crtc) {
> +		if (intel_crtc->active) {
> +			active_crtc_cnt++;
> +			seq_printf(m, "\nCRTC %d:  ", active_crtc_cnt);
> +
> +			drrs_status_per_crtc(m, dev, intel_crtc);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!active_crtc_cnt)
> +		seq_puts(m, "No active crtc found\n");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  struct pipe_crc_info {
>  	const char *name;
>  	struct drm_device *dev;
> @@ -4483,6 +4595,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = {
>  	{"i915_dp_mst_info", i915_dp_mst_info, 0},
>  	{"i915_wa_registers", i915_wa_registers, 0},
>  	{"i915_ddb_info", i915_ddb_info, 0},
> +	{"i915_drrs_status", i915_drrs_status, 0},
>  };
>  #define I915_DEBUGFS_ENTRIES ARRAY_SIZE(i915_debugfs_list)
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-24  0:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-13 10:02 [PATCH 0/6] eDP DRRS based on frontbuffer tracking Ramalingam C
2015-02-13 10:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Add support for DRRS in intel_dp_set_m_n Ramalingam C
2015-02-19 17:22   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-13 10:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/bdw: Add support for DRRS to switch RR Ramalingam C
2015-02-19 17:25   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-20  6:15     ` Ramalingam C
2015-02-20 18:34       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-13 10:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Support for RR switching on VLV Ramalingam C
2015-02-13 10:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Enable eDP DRRS for CHV Ramalingam C
2015-02-19 18:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-13 10:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] Documentation/drm: DocBook integration for DRRS Ramalingam C
2015-02-13 10:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Add debugfs entry " Ramalingam C
2015-02-19 18:45   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-20 14:37     ` Ramalingam C
2015-02-23 12:05       ` [PATCH] " Ramalingam C
2015-02-23 18:19         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-03-03 12:20           ` Ramalingam C
2015-02-24  0:39         ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-02-27 13:59           ` Ramalingam C
2015-03-03 15:23             ` Ramalingam C
2015-03-04 23:00               ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-03-05 11:18                 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-05 11:22                   ` Ramalingam C
2015-03-05 13:04                     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-23 12:08 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Enhancing eDP DRRS debug message Ramalingam C
2015-02-23 18:20   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24  0:51 ` [PATCH 0/6] eDP DRRS based on frontbuffer tracking Daniel Vetter
2015-02-27 14:29   ` Ramalingam C
2015-02-27 15:37     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-01  8:24       ` Ramalingam C
2015-03-03  6:41         ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Fixing mutex deadlock window at eDP DRRS Ramalingam C
2015-03-04 22:55           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-03-05 11:49             ` Daniel Vetter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-21 12:26 [PATCH 9/10] drm/i915: Add debugfs entry for DRRS Ramalingam C
2015-01-22 16:45 ` [PATCH] " Ramalingam C
2015-01-23 16:03   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-23 17:47     ` Ramalingam C
2015-01-23 17:52       ` Ramalingam C
2015-01-24  0:13         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-11 12:52           ` Ramalingam C

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150224003908.GL24485@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox