From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix frontbuffer false positve.
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:38:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150224203825.GD24485@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150224184419.GQ594@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:44:19AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:36:32AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Atomic bits needs to be set when cursor check function is returning 0
> > and intel_crtc is active.
> >
> > v2: When putting more debug prints I notice the solution was simpler
> > than I thought. AMS design is solid, just this return was wrong.
> > Sorry for the noise.
> >
> > Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 8ccf033..5fb83ba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -12198,7 +12198,7 @@ intel_check_cursor_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > }
> >
> > if (fb == crtc->cursor->fb)
> > - return 0;
> > + goto finish;
Shouldn't we just delete this check entirely? gcc will do it anyway for
us. When you do that you can also append the history I've dug out for
this.
The original regression seems to have been introduced in the original
check/commit split:
commit 757f9a3e5b8a812af0c213099a5b31cb423f4d3c
Author: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Wed Sep 24 14:20:24 2014 -0300
drm/i915: move check of intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj() out
Which already cause other trouble, resulting in the check getting moved in
commit e391ea882b1a04fb3f559287ac694652a3cd9da9
Author: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Wed Sep 24 14:20:25 2014 -0300
drm/i915: Fix not checking cursor and object sizes
The frontbuffer tracking itself only was broken when we shifted it into
the check/commit logic with:
commit 32b7eeec4d1e861230b09d437e95d76c86ff4a68
Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Date: Wed Dec 24 07:59:06 2014 -0800
drm/i915: Refactor work that can sleep out of commit (v7)
Cheers, Daniel
> >
> > if (fb->modifier[0] != DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE) {
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("cursor cannot be tiled\n");
> > --
> > 2.1.0
> >
>
> --
> Matt Roper
> Graphics Software Engineer
> IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
> Intel Corporation
> (916) 356-2795
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-02 23:38 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix frontbuffer false positve Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-03 7:06 ` shuang.he
2015-02-03 11:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-03 16:21 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-03 18:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-03 19:14 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-03 19:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-03 19:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-13 1:17 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-13 8:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-24 1:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 2:13 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 17:32 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 18:00 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 18:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 18:44 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 20:38 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-02-24 21:01 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 21:37 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 21:42 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 22:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-25 8:13 ` Jani Nikula
2015-02-26 9:15 ` shuang.he
2015-02-26 5:11 ` shuang.he
2015-02-24 2:14 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Clear crtc atomic flags at beginning of transaction Matt Roper
2015-02-24 17:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 17:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-03 19:34 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix frontbuffer false positve Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150224203825.GD24485@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox