From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix frontbuffer false positve.
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:42:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150224214239.GS594@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424813874-2395-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:37:54PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> This return 0 without setting atomic bits on fb == crtc->cursor->fb
> where causing frontbuffer false positives.
>
> According to Daniel:
>
> The original regression seems to have been introduced in the original
> check/commit split:
>
> commit 757f9a3e5b8a812af0c213099a5b31cb423f4d3c
> Author: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> Date: Wed Sep 24 14:20:24 2014 -0300
>
> drm/i915: move check of intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj() out
>
> Which already cause other trouble, resulting in the check getting moved in
>
> commit e391ea882b1a04fb3f559287ac694652a3cd9da9
> Author: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> Date: Wed Sep 24 14:20:25 2014 -0300
>
> drm/i915: Fix not checking cursor and object sizes
>
> The frontbuffer tracking itself only was broken when we shifted it into
> the check/commit logic with:
>
> commit 32b7eeec4d1e861230b09d437e95d76c86ff4a68
> Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Date: Wed Dec 24 07:59:06 2014 -0800
>
> drm/i915: Refactor work that can sleep out of commit (v7)
>
> v2: When putting more debug prints I notice the solution was simpler
> than I thought. AMS design is solid, just this return was wrong.
> Sorry for the noise.
>
> v3: Remove the entire chunck that would probably
> be removed by gcc anyway. (by Daniel)
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Not sure I understand Daniel's remark about gcc optimization, but the
change still looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 8ccf033..900dcaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -12197,9 +12197,6 @@ intel_check_cursor_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - if (fb == crtc->cursor->fb)
> - return 0;
> -
> if (fb->modifier[0] != DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("cursor cannot be tiled\n");
> ret = -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.1.0
>
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-02 23:38 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix frontbuffer false positve Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-03 7:06 ` shuang.he
2015-02-03 11:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-03 16:21 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-03 18:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-03 19:14 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-03 19:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-03 19:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-13 1:17 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-13 8:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-24 1:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 2:13 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 17:32 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 18:00 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 18:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 18:44 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 20:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-24 21:01 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 21:37 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 21:42 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2015-02-24 22:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-25 8:13 ` Jani Nikula
2015-02-26 9:15 ` shuang.he
2015-02-26 5:11 ` shuang.he
2015-02-24 2:14 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Clear crtc atomic flags at beginning of transaction Matt Roper
2015-02-24 17:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 17:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-03 19:34 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix frontbuffer false positve Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150224214239.GS594@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox