From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kernel.h: Implement DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:29:27 -0500
Message-ID: <20150324142926.GF17049@unpythonic.net>
References: <1427205825-5444-1-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com>
 <1427205825-5444-2-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1427205825-5444-2-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, emil.l.velikov@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

[for just patch 1/4; I didn't look as closely at the others]
Reviewed-by: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>

...with one half of a caveat (rounded up?): Like most or all of the
originals, and like DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST just above it in kernel.h, the new
code gives an incorrect answer if the temporary overflows at
+	unsigned long long _tmp = (x) + (__d) / 2;

As a doc improvement a remark could be added to a number of these
functions, but there's little reason for that to be part of this series.

Jeff