From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] tests/kms_fb_crc: call gem_sync() instead of gem_bo_busy()
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:06:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150326100647.GU1349@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427320239-25667-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:50:34PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>
> The way kms_fbc_crc works is that it does an operation that may
> trigger/invalidate/update FBC, then it sleeps for 300ms to wait for
> FBC to kick in again, then it calls "igt_assert(fbc_enabled())".
>
> This was causing problems where the BLT test would eventually fail in
> the fbc_eanbled() assertion.
>
> With the recent FBC move to front buffer rendering tracking, if we
> don't call gem_sync() after submitting render and blt commands, it may
> take much more than 300ms for FBC to be reenabled:
> i915_gem_execbuffer2() indirectly calls intel_fb_obj_invalidate(),
> which disables FBC, and then it is only reenabled when
> i915_gem_retire_work_handler() happens and indirectly calls
> intel_frontbuffer_flush(). Notice that while FBC is not yet enabled,
> the screen contents are correct, so this shouldn't really be a "bug".
>
> The gem_sync() call will make sure the long waits don't happen. With
> this, 300ms should be much more than enough: either we wait about 50ms
> for FBC to be re-enabled - intel_enable_fbc() uses a delayed work - or
> it's instantaneous - on the cases where we just do the nuke.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Hm maybe we should have 2 subtests: One with the bo_busy which only checks
that the screen contents is right. And then after a longer delay checks
that fbc gets reentered eventually. One with the gem_sync which also makes
sure fbc gets reentered more timely.
-Daniel
> ---
> tests/kms_fbc_crc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c b/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> index 4256fed..b3e6109 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static void fill_blt(data_t *data,
> intel_batchbuffer_flush(batch);
> intel_batchbuffer_free(batch);
>
> - gem_bo_busy(data->drm_fd, handle);
> + gem_sync(data->drm_fd, handle);
> }
>
> static void scratch_buf_init(struct igt_buf *buf, drm_intel_bo *bo)
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static void fill_render(data_t *data, uint32_t handle,
>
> intel_batchbuffer_free(batch);
>
> - gem_bo_busy(data->drm_fd, handle);
> + gem_sync(data->drm_fd, handle);
> }
>
> static bool fbc_enabled(data_t *data)
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-26 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-25 21:50 [PATCH 1/7] lib: add igt_wait() Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-25 21:50 ` [PATCH 2/7] tests/kms_fb_crc: call gem_sync() instead of gem_bo_busy() Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-26 10:06 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-03-25 21:50 ` [PATCH 3/7] tests/kms_fbc_crc: add wait_for_fbc_enabled() Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-26 10:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-25 21:50 ` [PATCH 4/7] tests/kms_fbc_crc: also gem_sync() on exec_nop() Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-25 21:50 ` [PATCH 5/7] tests/kms_fbc_crc: use igt_pipe_crc_collect_crc() Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-25 21:50 ` [PATCH 6/7] tests/kms_fbc_crc: remove redundant information from data_t Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-25 21:50 ` [PATCH 7/7] lib: add igt_draw Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-26 10:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-30 19:45 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-31 13:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-31 14:03 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-31 21:52 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-31 22:05 ` Chris Wilson
2015-04-01 22:08 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-04-01 22:22 ` Chris Wilson
2015-04-01 22:33 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-04-01 22:40 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-04-01 23:15 ` Chris Wilson
2015-04-01 23:17 ` Chris Wilson
2015-04-07 8:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-04-07 8:36 ` Chris Wilson
2015-04-07 9:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-04-07 10:12 ` Chris Wilson
2015-04-07 13:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-05-05 21:30 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-05-06 9:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-04-01 23:03 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150326100647.GU1349@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox