Re: [PATCH] drm: Kernel Crash in drm_unlock

[Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:25:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c
> > index f645268..80253a7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c
> > @@ -156,6 +156,14 @@ int drm_unlock(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv)
> 
> Also please rebase to latest upstream when submitting patches to the
> public (the function is now called drm_legacy_unlock).

While we're at it, how did you send those emails to not have the patch
ordering in the tags? we should have had 1/3, 2/3 and 3/3 tags there.

The usual way is to give the revision of the start of the series (the
patch just before what you want to send, ie.
  
  git send-email --to=intel-gfx HEAD~3

  or

  git send-email --to=intel-gfx drm-intel/drm-intel-nightly

Remember to use --dry-run the first few times if you're not sure.

HTH,

-- 
Damien
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx