From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Preallocate request before access of the ring
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 12:06:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150506100603.GN30184@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55422611.7030902@intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:54:41PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 29/04/15 17:10, yu.dai@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
> >
> > This is to avoid bad IO access caused by writing NOOP to wrap the
> > ring buffer whilst ring is unpinned.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > index 732fd63..3e8fcfd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > @@ -803,12 +803,12 @@ static int intel_logical_ring_begin(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf,
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - ret = logical_ring_prepare(ringbuf, ctx, num_dwords * sizeof(uint32_t));
> > + /* Preallocate the olr before touching the ring */
> > + ret = i915_gem_request_alloc(ring, ctx);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - /* Preallocate the olr before touching the ring */
> > - ret = i915_gem_request_alloc(ring, ctx);
> > + ret = logical_ring_prepare(ringbuf, ctx, num_dwords * sizeof(uint32_t));
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
>
> with input also from John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>, who
> would like to point out that this will be superceded by the Anti-OLR
> patches already posted. (In that model, the request will be allocated
> much earlier, and passed around explicitly rather than dangling from the
> context).
Do we need this for execlist in general, i.e. cc: stable? Where's the bug
report/igt testcase?
For serious-looking bugs please add more details like that to the commit
message, otherwise maintainers have no idea where to apply a patch.
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-06 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-29 16:10 [PATCH] drm/i915: Preallocate request before access of the ring yu.dai
2015-04-30 12:54 ` Dave Gordon
2015-05-06 10:06 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-06-29 11:39 ` Jani Nikula
2015-06-29 13:57 ` Dave Gordon
2015-06-29 14:44 ` Jani Nikula
2015-06-29 15:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-05-01 5:59 ` shuang.he
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150506100603.GN30184@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox