From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Konduru, Chandra" <chandra.konduru@intel.com>
Cc: "Vetter, Daniel" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Runyan, Arthur J" <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>,
"Syrjala, Ville" <ville.syrjala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add 90/270 rotation for NV12 format.
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:44:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150512104425.GT18908@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76A9B330A4D78C4D99CB292C4CC06C0E36FD3E9B@fmsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:32:07PM +0000, Konduru, Chandra wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 5:03 AM
> > To: Konduru, Chandra
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vetter, Daniel; Syrjala, Ville
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add 90/270 rotation for NV12
> > format.
> >
> > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 08:22:47PM -0700, Chandra Konduru wrote:
> > > Adding NV12 90/270 rotation support for primary and sprite planes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > -
> > > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > index c385a3b..77d7f69 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > @@ -3105,7 +3105,8 @@ static void skylake_update_primary_plane(struct
> > drm_crtc *crtc,
> > > int src_x = 0, src_y = 0, src_w = 0, src_h = 0;
> > > int dst_x = 0, dst_y = 0, dst_w = 0, dst_h = 0;
> > > int scaler_id = -1;
> > > - u32 aux_dist = 0, aux_x_offset = 0, aux_y_offset = 0, aux_stride = 0;
> > > + unsigned long aux_dist = 0;
> > > + u32 aux_x_offset = 0, aux_y_offset = 0, aux_stride = 0;
> > > u32 tile_row_adjustment = 0;
> > >
> > > plane_state = to_intel_plane_state(plane->state);
> > > @@ -3163,12 +3164,16 @@ static void skylake_update_primary_plane(struct
> > drm_crtc *crtc,
> > > x_offset = stride * tile_height - y - src_h;
> > > y_offset = x;
> > > plane_size = (src_w - 1) << 16 | (src_h - 1);
> > > - /*
> > > - * TBD: For NV12 90/270 rotation, Y and UV subplanes should
> > > - * be treated as separate surfaces and GTT remapping for
> > > - * rotation should be done separately for each subplane.
> > > - * Enable support once seperate remappings are available.
> > > - */
> > > +
> > > + if (fb->pixel_format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12) {
> > > + u32 uv_tile_height = intel_tile_height(dev, fb-
> > >pixel_format,
> > > + fb->modifier[0], 1);
> > > + aux_stride = DIV_ROUND_UP(fb->height / 2,
> > uv_tile_height);
> > > + aux_dist =
> > intel_plane_obj_offset(to_intel_plane(plane), obj, 1) -
> > > + surf_addr;
> > > + aux_x_offset = aux_stride * uv_tile_height - y / 2 - fb-
> > >height / 2;
> > > + aux_y_offset = x / 2;
> > > + }
> > > } else {
> > > stride = fb->pitches[0] / stride_div;
> > > x_offset = x;
> > > @@ -13144,6 +13149,10 @@ intel_check_primary_plane(struct drm_plane
> > *plane,
> > > if (fb && format_is_yuv(fb->pixel_format)) {
> > > src->x1 &= ~0x10000;
> > > src->x2 &= ~0x10000;
> > > + if (intel_rotation_90_or_270(state->base.rotation)) {
> > > + src->y1 &= ~0x10000;
> > > + src->y2 &= ~0x10000;
> > > + }
> >
> > This feels fishy. Why do we need to make the Y coordinates even? The
> > reson for making the X coordinates even is to make them macropixel
> > aligned, but there are no macropixels in the Y direction so this
> > doesn't make much sense to me.
>
> Hi Ville,
> Per skl spec, it is expecting even lines aligned with 90/270 rotation not only
> for NV12 but also for 422 formats. Perhaps we might have missed when 90/270
> enabled for packed YUV formats.
The src coordinates are always in the fb orientation, so macropixels
appear in the src.x direction only. And when we do 90/270 rotation the
hardware Y offset comes from src.x coordinates.
The spec does seem a bit confused though; It claims the X offset must
always be even for YUV422+NV12, and the Y offset must be even when
rotated 90/270 degrees. I suspect the X offset text just didn't get
updated when 90/270 rotation was added.
Art, can you confirm?
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-12 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-09 3:22 [PATCH 0/2] Add NV12 90/270 support for skl planes Chandra Konduru
2015-05-09 3:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: call intel_tile_height with correct parameter Chandra Konduru
2015-05-11 9:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-05-11 10:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-05-09 3:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add 90/270 rotation for NV12 format Chandra Konduru
2015-05-11 12:03 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-05-11 23:32 ` Konduru, Chandra
2015-05-12 10:44 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-05-12 19:26 ` Runyan, Arthur J
2015-05-15 21:58 ` Konduru, Chandra
2015-05-18 19:19 ` Runyan, Arthur J
2015-05-19 23:12 ` Konduru, Chandra
2015-05-20 12:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-05-22 18:07 ` Runyan, Arthur J
2015-05-22 18:28 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150512104425.GT18908@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arthur.j.runyan@intel.com \
--cc=chandra.konduru@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox