From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/bios: be more explicit about discarding iomem address space
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:00:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150518080034.GG15256@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431520445-24998-3-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:34:05PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add one explicit discard of __iomem address space qualifier in
> validate_vbt(), and respect it otherwise. This adds clarity in the code,
> and reduces the sparse warnings from the module to just one.
>
> Quoting Daniel, "The vbt really is plain old memory. Except that it's
> reserved in the e820 table as something special and hence treated as io
> range by the kernel. But it is memory, hence casting away the __iomem is
> imo the right approach."
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Merged entire series, thanks.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> index 6e018ba53035..198fc3c3291b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> @@ -1199,15 +1199,22 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id intel_no_opregion_vbt[] = {
> { }
> };
>
> -static const struct bdb_header *validate_vbt(const void *base, size_t size,
> - const void *_vbt,
> +static const struct bdb_header *validate_vbt(const void __iomem *_base,
> + size_t size,
> + const void __iomem *_vbt,
> const char *source)
> {
> - const struct vbt_header *vbt = _vbt;
> - size_t offset;
> + /*
> + * This is the one place where we explicitly discard the address space
> + * (__iomem) of the BIOS/VBT. (And this will cause a sparse complaint.)
> + * From now on everything is based on 'base', and treated as regular
> + * memory.
> + */
> + const void *base = (const void *) _base;
> + size_t offset = _vbt - _base;
> + const struct vbt_header *vbt = base + offset;
> const struct bdb_header *bdb;
>
> - offset = _vbt - base;
> if (offset + sizeof(struct vbt_header) > size) {
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("VBT header incomplete\n");
> return NULL;
> @@ -1235,14 +1242,14 @@ static const struct bdb_header *validate_vbt(const void *base, size_t size,
> return bdb;
> }
>
> -static const struct bdb_header *find_vbt(void *bios, size_t size)
> +static const struct bdb_header *find_vbt(void __iomem *bios, size_t size)
> {
> const struct bdb_header *bdb = NULL;
> size_t i;
>
> /* Scour memory looking for the VBT signature. */
> for (i = 0; i + 4 < size; i++) {
> - if (memcmp(bios + i, "$VBT", 4) == 0) {
> + if (ioread32(bios + i) == *((const u32 *) "$VBT")) {
> bdb = validate_vbt(bios, size, bios + i, "PCI ROM");
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-18 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-13 12:34 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/bios: remove a redundant NULL pointer check Jani Nikula
2015-05-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/bios: abstract finding VBT in BIOS to a separate function Jani Nikula
2015-05-13 12:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/bios: be more explicit about discarding iomem address space Jani Nikula
2015-05-14 9:06 ` shuang.he
2015-05-18 8:00 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150518080034.GG15256@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox