Re: [PATCH v4 11/12] drm/i915: Add IS_BDW_ULX

From: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
To: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/12] drm/i915: Add IS_BDW_ULX
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:33:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150529113317.GC28280@strange.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432282962-3530-12-git-send-email-mika.kahola@intel.com>

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:22:41AM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> We need to tell BDW ULT and ULX apart.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> v2: Rebased to the latest
> v3: Rebased to the latest
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> 
> Author:    Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>

-- 
Damien

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 37e8e9d..c85d802 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2362,6 +2362,9 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
>  				 ((INTEL_DEVID(dev) & 0xf) == 0x6 ||	\
>  				 (INTEL_DEVID(dev) & 0xf) == 0xb ||	\
>  				 (INTEL_DEVID(dev) & 0xf) == 0xe))
> +/* ULX machines are also considered ULT. */
> +#define IS_BDW_ULX(dev)		(IS_BROADWELL(dev) && \
> +				 (INTEL_DEVID(dev) & 0xf) == 0xe)
>  #define IS_BDW_GT3(dev)		(IS_BROADWELL(dev) && \
>  				 (INTEL_DEVID(dev) & 0x00F0) == 0x0020)
>  #define IS_HSW_ULT(dev)		(IS_HASWELL(dev) && \
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx