From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sure our labels start at column 0
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:27:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150605092721.GT5176@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fv66a4o2.fsf@intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 12:24:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jun 2015, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 04:56:18PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> >> I noticed one of those and it turned out we have a few lingering around.
> >
> > Yuck. I'd prefer we got the other way. Consider the following diffs for example:
>
> What's the, uh, diff between those to consider?
Look at the @@ line. One tells you in which function the line is added,
the other one doesn't. It always pisses me off when reviewing patches
cause then I have to figure out the function based on the label,
surroundng context, and/or line numbers.
I'm also thinking this may have caused some of the numerous misapplied
patches we've had since our labels all tend to be similar.
>
> Anyway, a quick git grep popularity contest within the kernel tree and
> checkpatch (WARNING: labels should not be indented) tell me to go with
> Damien.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index 7f6fd85..342509d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ out:
> >
> > pps_unlock(intel_dp);
> >
> > + // foo
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index 5901e00..2673347 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >
> > pps_unlock(intel_dp);
> >
> > + // foo
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> index a96f181..2354927 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> @@ -6980,7 +6980,7 @@ static int i965gm_get_display_clock_speed(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>
> >> return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(vco, div_table[cdclk_sel]);
> >>
> >> - fail:
> >> +fail:
> >> DRM_ERROR("Unable to determine CDCLK. HPLL VCO=%u kHz, CFGC=0x%04x\n", vco, tmp);
> >> return 200000;
> >> }
> >> @@ -7021,7 +7021,7 @@ static int g33_get_display_clock_speed(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>
> >> return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(vco, div_table[cdclk_sel]);
> >>
> >> - fail:
> >> +fail:
> >> DRM_ERROR("Unable to determine CDCLK. HPLL VCO=%u kHz, CFGC=0x%08x\n", vco, tmp);
> >> return 190476;
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> >> index 8193a35..f5965fb 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> >> @@ -1189,6 +1189,6 @@ intel_plane_init(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe, int plane)
> >>
> >> drm_plane_helper_add(&intel_plane->base, &intel_plane_helper_funcs);
> >>
> >> - out:
> >> +out:
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 2.1.0
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Intel-gfx mailing list
> >> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel OTC
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-05 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-04 15:56 [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sure our labels start at column 0 Damien Lespiau
2015-06-04 16:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-06-05 9:24 ` Jani Nikula
2015-06-05 9:27 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-06-05 10:04 ` Damien Lespiau
2015-06-05 13:47 ` Dave Gordon
2015-06-15 12:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-15 18:18 ` Dave Gordon
2015-06-05 14:51 ` shuang.he
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150605092721.GT5176@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox