[PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: remove unnecessary null test

[PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: remove unnecessary null test

[Sudip Mukherjee]

While creating the debugfs file we are setting the inode->i_private to
dev. That same dev is passed to these functions as private of struct
seq_file via single_open(). Moreover single_open is setting
file->private_data->private to dev.
So at this point it can never be NULL.
This check was added by commit eb3394faeb97 ("drm/i915: Add debugfs test
control files for Displayport compliance testing")

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---

v3: removed the check in i915_displayport_test_active_write also
v2: removed null check
v1 was drm/i915: fix possible null pointer dereference

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 21 +--------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index bc817da..ffce62e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -4028,24 +4028,14 @@ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file,
 {
 	char *input_buffer;
 	int status = 0;
-	struct seq_file *m;
 	struct drm_device *dev;
 	struct drm_connector *connector;
 	struct list_head *connector_list;
 	struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
 	int val = 0;
 
-	m = file->private_data;
-	if (!m) {
-		status = -ENODEV;
-		return status;
-	}
-	dev = m->private;
+	dev = ((struct seq_file *)file->private_data)->private;
 
-	if (!dev) {
-		status = -ENODEV;
-		return status;
-	}
 	connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
 
 	if (len == 0)
@@ -4103,9 +4093,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_active_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 	struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
 	struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
 
-	if (!dev)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
 	list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {
 
 		if (connector->connector_type !=
@@ -4150,9 +4137,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_data_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 	struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
 	struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
 
-	if (!dev)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
 	list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {
 
 		if (connector->connector_type !=
@@ -4192,9 +4176,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_type_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 	struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
 	struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
 
-	if (!dev)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
 	list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {
 
 		if (connector->connector_type !=
-- 
1.8.1.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915: remove redundant if check

[Sudip Mukherjee]

The extra check for connector_type is not required as we are already
checking for connector_type != DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort.
The check was added by commit eb3394faeb97 ("drm/i915: Add debugfs test
control files for Displayport compliance testing")

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---
v3: It is new. Submitting together in a series as the changes are in the
same part of the code.

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index ffce62e..caf1382 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -4059,9 +4059,7 @@ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file,
 		    DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort)
 			continue;
 
-		if (connector->connector_type ==
-		    DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort &&
-		    connector->status == connector_status_connected &&
+		if (connector->status == connector_status_connected &&
 		    connector->encoder != NULL) {
 			intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
 			status = kstrtoint(input_buffer, 10, &val);
-- 
1.8.1.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: remove unnecessary null test

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:36:45PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> While creating the debugfs file we are setting the inode->i_private to
> dev. That same dev is passed to these functions as private of struct
> seq_file via single_open(). Moreover single_open is setting
> file->private_data->private to dev.
> So at this point it can never be NULL.
> This check was added by commit eb3394faeb97 ("drm/i915: Add debugfs test
> control files for Displayport compliance testing")
> 

Still missing

Cc: Chris Wilson ...
Cc: Todd Previte ...

here to make sure reviewers/original authors are in the loop. Anyway this
is a simple enough patch, so I just pulled them both in.

Thanks, Daniel

> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> ---
> 
> v3: removed the check in i915_displayport_test_active_write also
> v2: removed null check
> v1 was drm/i915: fix possible null pointer dereference
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 21 +--------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index bc817da..ffce62e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -4028,24 +4028,14 @@ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file,
>  {
>  	char *input_buffer;
>  	int status = 0;
> -	struct seq_file *m;
>  	struct drm_device *dev;
>  	struct drm_connector *connector;
>  	struct list_head *connector_list;
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
>  	int val = 0;
>  
> -	m = file->private_data;
> -	if (!m) {
> -		status = -ENODEV;
> -		return status;
> -	}
> -	dev = m->private;
> +	dev = ((struct seq_file *)file->private_data)->private;
>  
> -	if (!dev) {
> -		status = -ENODEV;
> -		return status;
> -	}
>  	connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
>  
>  	if (len == 0)
> @@ -4103,9 +4093,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_active_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  	struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
>  
> -	if (!dev)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
>  	list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {
>  
>  		if (connector->connector_type !=
> @@ -4150,9 +4137,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_data_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  	struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
>  
> -	if (!dev)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
>  	list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {
>  
>  		if (connector->connector_type !=
> @@ -4192,9 +4176,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_type_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  	struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
>  
> -	if (!dev)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
>  	list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {
>  
>  		if (connector->connector_type !=
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: remove unnecessary null test

[Sudip Mukherjee]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 03:51:40PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:36:45PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > While creating the debugfs file we are setting the inode->i_private to
> > dev. That same dev is passed to these functions as private of struct
> > seq_file via single_open(). Moreover single_open is setting
> > file->private_data->private to dev.
> > So at this point it can never be NULL.
> > This check was added by commit eb3394faeb97 ("drm/i915: Add debugfs test
> > control files for Displayport compliance testing")
> > 
> 
> Still missing
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson ...
> Cc: Todd Previte ...
> 
> here to make sure reviewers/original authors are in the loop. Anyway this
> is a simple enough patch, so I just pulled them both in.
Sorry. did you mean to put Cc: here before the Signed-off-by: ?
I have put them in Cc list of the patches.
For my next patch you will not get these issues.

regards
sudip
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx