public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] drm/i915: DSI pixel clock check
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:15:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150812181559.GF5176@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438344840-3490-7-git-send-email-mika.kahola@intel.com>

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:13:55PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> It is possible the we request to have a mode that has
> higher pixel clock than our HW can support. This patch
> checks if requested pixel clock is lower than the one
> supported by the HW. The requested mode is discarded
> if we cannot support the requested pixel clock.
> 
> This patch applies to DSI.
> 
> V2:
> - removed computation for max pixel clock
> 
> V3:
> - cleanup by removing unnecessary lines
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 18dd7d7..3def6f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -654,6 +654,7 @@ intel_dsi_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  {
>  	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = to_intel_connector(connector);
>  	struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode = intel_connector->panel.fixed_mode;
> +	int max_pixclk = to_i915(connector->dev)->max_dotclk;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>  
> @@ -669,6 +670,9 @@ intel_dsi_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  			return MODE_PANEL;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (mode->clock > max_pixclk)
> +		return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> +

Hmm. Seems like this too ought to be checking the fixed_mode.
intel_dsi_mode_valid() seems to assume there could be no fixed mode,
but looking at intel_dsi_init() tells me that can't be (if we ignore the
totally broken looking error handling).

Also we don't set up the panel fitter in the DSI code even though the
presence of fixed_mode clearly indicates that we should. So the whole
thing seems more or less busted.

For now, I think just sticking the clock check inside the 'if (fixed_mode)'
block would be fine, and then someone can try to clean up the bigger
mess.

>  	return MODE_OK;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-12 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-31 12:13 [PATCH v3 00/11] Check pixel clock when setting mode Mika Kahola
2015-07-31 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] drm/i915: Store max dotclock Mika Kahola
2015-08-12 17:30   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-12 19:01     ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-13  8:21       ` Mika Kahola
2015-07-31 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] drm/i915: DisplayPort pixel clock check Mika Kahola
2015-08-12 18:50   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-07-31 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] drm/i915: HDMI " Mika Kahola
2015-08-12 18:34   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-14  8:30     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-14 13:03       ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-14 13:11         ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-31 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] drm/i915: LVDS " Mika Kahola
2015-08-12 17:40   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-07-31 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] drm/i915: SDVO " Mika Kahola
2015-08-12 17:46   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-07-31 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] drm/i915: DSI " Mika Kahola
2015-08-12 18:15   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-07-31 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] drm/i915: CRT " Mika Kahola
2015-08-12 18:59   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-07-31 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] drm/i915: TV " Mika Kahola
2015-08-12 18:24   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-14  8:33     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-31 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] drm/i915: DisplayPort-MST " Mika Kahola
2015-08-12 18:49   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-14  8:36     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-31 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] drm/i915: DVO " Mika Kahola
2015-08-12 18:41   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-07-31 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] drm/i915: Max DOT clock frequency to debugfs Mika Kahola
2015-08-10 13:25   ` shuang.he

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150812181559.GF5176@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mika.kahola@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox