Re: [PATCH 01/18] tests/gem_storedw_loop: add new store_dword test to unify per-ring ones

[Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>]

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 08:21:12AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On 08/14/2015 05:19 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 01:31:24PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >> There was a lot of duplication going on...  Mark as basic while we're at
> >> it as these should never fail.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> >> ---
> >>  tests/Makefile.sources   |   1 +
> >>  tests/gem_storedw_loop.c | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  2 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 tests/gem_storedw_loop.c
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.sources b/tests/Makefile.sources
> >> index b9a4cb4..cdcee33 100644
> >> --- a/tests/Makefile.sources
> >> +++ b/tests/Makefile.sources
> >> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ TESTS_progs = \
> >>  	gem_seqno_wrap \
> >>  	gem_set_tiling_vs_gtt \
> >>  	gem_set_tiling_vs_pwrite \
> >> +	gem_storedw_loop \
> >>  	gem_storedw_loop_blt \
> >>  	gem_storedw_loop_bsd \
> >>  	gem_storedw_loop_render \
> > 
> > Why not remove the old ones while at it? This just means more gunk in the
> > overall igt set. Also please update .gitignore here for these ...
> 
> Yeah figured that would be a separate patch assuming this one looked ok.
> I added it to the .gitignore in a later patch to update it all at once.

At least in the past when we renamed tests we've done it in one go. That
way QA has an easier time finding the rename in git logs, otherwise
they're just "oh it's gone" and don't carry over existing bug reports.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx