From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: fix FBC for cases where crtc->base.y is non-zero
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:04:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150921140449.GI26517@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442254803-20043-9-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 03:20:03PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> I only tested this on BDW and SKL, but since the register description
> is the same ever since gen4, let's assume that all gens take the same
> register format. If that's not true, then hopefully someone will
> bisect a bug to this patch and we'll fix it.
>
> Notice that the wrong fence offset register just means that the
> hardware tracking will be wrong.
>
> Testcases:
> - igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt
> - igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-2p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt
>
> v2:
> - Add intel_crtc->adjusted_{x,y} so this code can work independently
> of intel_gen4_compute_page_offset(). (Ville).
> - This version also works on SKL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index fc00867..c27a636 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -2730,6 +2730,9 @@ static void i9xx_update_primary_plane(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> (intel_crtc->config->pipe_src_w - 1) * pixel_size;
> }
>
> + intel_crtc->adjusted_x = x;
> + intel_crtc->adjusted_y = y;
> +
> I915_WRITE(reg, dspcntr);
>
> I915_WRITE(DSPSTRIDE(plane), fb->pitches[0]);
> @@ -2830,6 +2833,9 @@ static void ironlake_update_primary_plane(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> }
> }
>
> + intel_crtc->adjusted_x = x;
> + intel_crtc->adjusted_y = y;
> +
> I915_WRITE(reg, dspcntr);
>
> I915_WRITE(DSPSTRIDE(plane), fb->pitches[0]);
> @@ -3082,6 +3088,9 @@ static void skylake_update_primary_plane(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> }
> plane_offset = y_offset << 16 | x_offset;
>
> + intel_crtc->adjusted_x = x_offset;
> + intel_crtc->adjusted_y = y_offset;
> +
> I915_WRITE(PLANE_CTL(pipe, 0), plane_ctl);
> I915_WRITE(PLANE_OFFSET(pipe, 0), plane_offset);
> I915_WRITE(PLANE_SIZE(pipe, 0), plane_size);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 02a755a..6054bcb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -537,6 +537,8 @@ struct intel_crtc {
> * gen4+ this only adjusts up to a tile, offsets within a tile are
> * handled in the hw itself (with the TILEOFF register). */
> unsigned long dspaddr_offset;
> + int adjusted_x;
> + int adjusted_y;
>
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *cursor_bo;
> uint32_t cursor_addr;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> index a3a97f2..2319dc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,19 @@
> #include "intel_drv.h"
> #include "i915_drv.h"
>
> +/*
> + * In some platforms where the CRTC's x:0/y:0 coordinates doesn't match the
> + * frontbuffer's x:0/y:0 coordinates we lie to the hardware about the plane's
> + * origin so the x and y offsets can actually fit the registers. As a
> + * consequence, the fence doesn't really start exactly at the display plane
> + * address we program because it starts at the real start of the buffer, so we
> + * have to take this into consideration here.
> + */
> +static unsigned int get_crtc_fence_y_offset(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> + return crtc->base.y - crtc->adjusted_y;
> +}
We may want to move over to using the plane state here in the future.
But for now it looks OK, so:
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> +
> static void i8xx_fbc_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> u32 fbc_ctl;
> @@ -97,7 +110,7 @@ static void i8xx_fbc_enable(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> fbc_ctl2 = FBC_CTL_FENCE_DBL | FBC_CTL_IDLE_IMM | FBC_CTL_CPU_FENCE;
> fbc_ctl2 |= FBC_CTL_PLANE(crtc->plane);
> I915_WRITE(FBC_CONTROL2, fbc_ctl2);
> - I915_WRITE(FBC_FENCE_OFF, crtc->base.y);
> + I915_WRITE(FBC_FENCE_OFF, get_crtc_fence_y_offset(crtc));
> }
>
> /* enable it... */
> @@ -135,7 +148,7 @@ static void g4x_fbc_enable(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> dpfc_ctl |= DPFC_CTL_LIMIT_1X;
> dpfc_ctl |= DPFC_CTL_FENCE_EN | obj->fence_reg;
>
> - I915_WRITE(DPFC_FENCE_YOFF, crtc->base.y);
> + I915_WRITE(DPFC_FENCE_YOFF, get_crtc_fence_y_offset(crtc));
>
> /* enable it... */
> I915_WRITE(DPFC_CONTROL, dpfc_ctl | DPFC_CTL_EN);
> @@ -177,6 +190,7 @@ static void ilk_fbc_enable(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_obj(fb);
> u32 dpfc_ctl;
> int threshold = dev_priv->fbc.threshold;
> + unsigned int y_offset;
>
> dev_priv->fbc.enabled = true;
>
> @@ -200,7 +214,8 @@ static void ilk_fbc_enable(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> if (IS_GEN5(dev_priv))
> dpfc_ctl |= obj->fence_reg;
>
> - I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_FENCE_YOFF, crtc->base.y);
> + y_offset = get_crtc_fence_y_offset(crtc);
> + I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_FENCE_YOFF, y_offset);
> I915_WRITE(ILK_FBC_RT_BASE, i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj) | ILK_FBC_RT_VALID);
> /* enable it... */
> I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_CONTROL, dpfc_ctl | DPFC_CTL_EN);
> @@ -208,7 +223,7 @@ static void ilk_fbc_enable(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> if (IS_GEN6(dev_priv)) {
> I915_WRITE(SNB_DPFC_CTL_SA,
> SNB_CPU_FENCE_ENABLE | obj->fence_reg);
> - I915_WRITE(DPFC_CPU_FENCE_OFFSET, crtc->base.y);
> + I915_WRITE(DPFC_CPU_FENCE_OFFSET, y_offset);
> }
>
> intel_fbc_nuke(dev_priv);
> @@ -288,7 +303,7 @@ static void gen7_fbc_enable(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>
> I915_WRITE(SNB_DPFC_CTL_SA,
> SNB_CPU_FENCE_ENABLE | obj->fence_reg);
> - I915_WRITE(DPFC_CPU_FENCE_OFFSET, crtc->base.y);
> + I915_WRITE(DPFC_CPU_FENCE_OFFSET, get_crtc_fence_y_offset(crtc));
>
> intel_fbc_nuke(dev_priv);
>
> --
> 2.5.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-21 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-14 18:19 [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: fix the FBC work allocation failure path Paulo Zanoni
2015-09-14 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: check for the supported strides on HSW+ FBC Paulo Zanoni
2015-09-21 13:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-09-14 18:19 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: avoid the last 8mb of stolen on BDW/SKL Paulo Zanoni
2015-09-21 13:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-09-14 18:19 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: print the correct amount of bytes allocated for the CFB Paulo Zanoni
2015-09-14 18:19 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: don't enable FBC when pixel rate exceeds 95% on HSW/BDW Paulo Zanoni
2015-09-21 13:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-09-14 18:20 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: apply WaFbcAsynchFlipDisableFbcQueue earlier Paulo Zanoni
2015-09-14 18:20 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: don't apply WaFbcAsynchFlipDisableFbcQueue on SKL Paulo Zanoni
2015-09-14 18:20 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: reject invalid formats for FBC Paulo Zanoni
2015-09-21 14:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-09-21 22:48 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-09-14 18:20 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: fix FBC for cases where crtc->base.y is non-zero Paulo Zanoni
2015-09-21 14:04 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-09-23 9:09 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150921140449.GI26517@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox