intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Atomic watermark updates (v5)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:20:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150930152004.GN3383@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443135200-9870-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 03:53:05PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> Previous version of the series was here:
>   http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-September/075883.html
> 
> Pretty minimal changes since the last series:
>  * General rebasing on di-nightly
>  * Some minor SKL-specific bugfixes on patch #6 based on Maarten's review of
>    v4 of this series.
>  * Added a new patch #14 to try to sanitize watermarks after hardware state
>    readout.  Once we've read general state out of the hardware, we should
>    recalculate what we think the watermarks for that state should be and not
>    just trust whatever the system firmware happens to have programmed them to.
>  * Added Maarten's r-b to all patches except the new #14; he gave it on his
>    feedback to patch #6 of the last revision of the series and I didn't notice
>    that it applied to the whole series until I re-read his feedback.  :-)

Pulled in all into dinq, thanks!
-Daniel

> 
> Matt Roper (14):
>   drm/i915: Drop redundant watermark programming
>   drm/i915: Eliminate usage of plane_wm_parameters from ILK-style WM
>     code (v2)
>   drm/i915: Eliminate usage of pipe_wm_parameters from ILK-style WM (v2)
>   drm/i915: Determine I915_MAX_PLANES from plane enum
>   drm/i915/skl: Simplify wm structures slightly (v2)
>   drm/i915/skl: Eliminate usage of pipe_wm_parameters from SKL-style WM
>     (v3)
>   drm/i915/ivb: Move WaCxSRDisabledForSpriteScaling w/a to atomic check
>   drm/i915: Drop intel_update_sprite_watermarks
>   drm/i915: Calculate pipe watermarks into CRTC state (v3)
>   drm/i915: Calculate ILK-style watermarks during atomic check (v3)
>   drm/i915: Don't set plane visible during HW readout if CRTC is off
>   drm/i915: Calculate watermark configuration during atomic check (v2)
>   drm/i915: Sanitize watermarks after hardware state readout
>   drm/i915: Add two-stage ILK-style watermark programming (v5)
> 
> Ville Syrjälä (1):
>   drm/i915: Refactor ilk_update_wm (v3)
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c  |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      |  41 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c  |   2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 255 +++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  85 +++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 855 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c  |  15 -
>  7 files changed, 707 insertions(+), 548 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-30 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-24 22:53 [PATCH 00/15] Atomic watermark updates (v5) Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Drop redundant watermark programming Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Eliminate usage of plane_wm_parameters from ILK-style WM code (v2) Matt Roper
2016-01-05 12:49   ` Flicker caused by "drm/i915: Eliminate usage of plane_wm_parameters from ILK-style WM code (v2)" Jan Niehusmann
2016-01-05 21:58     ` Matt Roper
2016-01-06  0:46       ` Jan Niehusmann
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915: Eliminate usage of pipe_wm_parameters from ILK-style WM (v2) Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: Determine I915_MAX_PLANES from plane enum Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915/skl: Simplify wm structures slightly (v2) Matt Roper
2015-09-30 15:13   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915/skl: Eliminate usage of pipe_wm_parameters from SKL-style WM (v3) Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915/ivb: Move WaCxSRDisabledForSpriteScaling w/a to atomic check Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Drop intel_update_sprite_watermarks Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915: Refactor ilk_update_wm (v3) Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915: Calculate pipe watermarks into CRTC state (v3) Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: Calculate ILK-style watermarks during atomic check (v3) Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: Don't set plane visible during HW readout if CRTC is off Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915: Calculate watermark configuration during atomic check (v2) Matt Roper
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915: Sanitize watermarks after hardware state readout Matt Roper
2015-10-01 13:58   ` Jani Nikula
2015-10-01 16:12     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-01 16:53     ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Convert hsw_compute_linetime_wm to use in-flight state Matt Roper
2015-10-06 14:34       ` Jani Nikula
2015-09-24 22:53 ` [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: Add two-stage ILK-style watermark programming (v5) Matt Roper
2015-09-30 15:20 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-09-30 22:21   ` [PATCH 00/15] Atomic watermark updates (v5) Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-10-01 23:03     ` [PATCH] fixup! drm/i915/skl: Eliminate usage of pipe_wm_parameters from SKL-style WM (v3) Matt Roper
2015-10-02 18:43       ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-10-06 10:13         ` [PATCH] fixup! drm/i915/skl: Eliminate usage of pipe_wm_parameters from SKL-style WM (v3) [regression] Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150930152004.GN3383@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).