* [drm-intel:for-linux-next 809/813] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c:387:6: sparse: symbol 'vlv_dsi_reset_clocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2015-10-05 8:21 kbuild test robot
2015-10-05 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH drm-intel] drm/i915/bxt: vlv_dsi_reset_clocks() can be static kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2015-10-05 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shashank Sharma; +Cc: Jani Nikula, Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, kbuild-all
tree: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
head: 068127601eefa0565f4b2f4d82750cad9e37000c
commit: b389a45c6b2f9b310ddf631d23b9e3e045cf747b [809/813] drm/i915/bxt: DSI disable and post-disable
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
git checkout b389a45c6b2f9b310ddf631d23b9e3e045cf747b
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c:387:6: sparse: symbol 'vlv_dsi_reset_clocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c:545:6: sparse: symbol 'bxt_dsi_reset_clocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH drm-intel] drm/i915/bxt: vlv_dsi_reset_clocks() can be static
2015-10-05 8:21 [drm-intel:for-linux-next 809/813] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c:387:6: sparse: symbol 'vlv_dsi_reset_clocks' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
@ 2015-10-05 8:21 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-05 11:57 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2015-10-05 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shashank Sharma; +Cc: Jani Nikula, Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, kbuild-all
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
intel_dsi_pll.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
index c9a38f4..d85f1eaf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ u32 vlv_get_dsi_pclk(struct intel_encoder *encoder, int pipe_bpp)
return pclk;
}
-void vlv_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
+static void vlv_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
{
u32 temp;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = encoder->base.dev->dev_private;
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ void intel_disable_dsi_pll(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
bxt_disable_dsi_pll(encoder);
}
-void bxt_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
+static void bxt_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
{
u32 tmp;
struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH drm-intel] drm/i915/bxt: vlv_dsi_reset_clocks() can be static
2015-10-05 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH drm-intel] drm/i915/bxt: vlv_dsi_reset_clocks() can be static kbuild test robot
@ 2015-10-05 11:57 ` Jani Nikula
2015-10-06 8:57 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2015-10-05 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild test robot, Shashank Sharma; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, kbuild-all
On Mon, 05 Oct 2015, kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> intel_dsi_pll.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
> index c9a38f4..d85f1eaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ u32 vlv_get_dsi_pclk(struct intel_encoder *encoder, int pipe_bpp)
> return pclk;
> }
>
> -void vlv_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
> +static void vlv_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
> {
> u32 temp;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = encoder->base.dev->dev_private;
> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ void intel_disable_dsi_pll(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> bxt_disable_dsi_pll(encoder);
> }
>
> -void bxt_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
> +static void bxt_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
> {
> u32 tmp;
> struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH drm-intel] drm/i915/bxt: vlv_dsi_reset_clocks() can be static
2015-10-05 11:57 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2015-10-06 8:57 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2015-10-06 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, kbuild-all, kbuild test robot
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:57:57PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Oct 2015, kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
>
>
> > ---
> > intel_dsi_pll.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
> > index c9a38f4..d85f1eaf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
> > @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ u32 vlv_get_dsi_pclk(struct intel_encoder *encoder, int pipe_bpp)
> > return pclk;
> > }
> >
> > -void vlv_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
> > +static void vlv_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
> > {
> > u32 temp;
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = encoder->base.dev->dev_private;
> > @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ void intel_disable_dsi_pll(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > bxt_disable_dsi_pll(encoder);
> > }
> >
> > -void bxt_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
> > +static void bxt_dsi_reset_clocks(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum port port)
> > {
> > u32 tmp;
> > struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-06 8:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-05 8:21 [drm-intel:for-linux-next 809/813] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c:387:6: sparse: symbol 'vlv_dsi_reset_clocks' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2015-10-05 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH drm-intel] drm/i915/bxt: vlv_dsi_reset_clocks() can be static kbuild test robot
2015-10-05 11:57 ` Jani Nikula
2015-10-06 8:57 ` Daniel Vetter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox