From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/i915: On fb alloc failure, unref gem object where it gets refed
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:39:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151013153931.GS26517@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521e48fc5fc8d211ed2847070120ff4032b7a383.1441363361.git.lukas@wunner.de>
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 11:50:58AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Currently when allocating a framebuffer fails, the gem object gets
> unrefed at the bottom of the call chain in __intel_framebuffer_create,
> not where it gets refed, which is in intel_framebuffer_create_for_mode
> (via i915_gem_alloc_object) and in intel_user_framebuffer_create
> (via drm_gem_object_lookup).
>
> This invites mistakes: As discovered by Tvrtko Ursulin, a double unref
> has sneaked into intelfb_alloc (which calls __intel_framebuffer_create).
>
> As suggested by Ville Syrjälä, improve code clarity by moving the unref
> away from __intel_framebuffer_create to where the gem object gets refed.
>
> [Changelog is in preceding patch by Tvrtko Ursulin.]
>
> Tested-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow@free.fr>
> [MBP 5,3 2009 nvidia 9400M + 9600M GT pre-retina]
> Tested-by: Paul Hordiienko <pvt.gord@gmail.com>
> [MBP 6,2 2010 intel ILK + nvidia GT216 pre-retina]
> Tested-by: William Brown <william@blackhats.net.au>
> [MBP 8,2 2011 intel SNB + amd turks pre-retina]
> Tested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> [MBP 9,1 2012 intel IVB + nvidia GK107 pre-retina]
> Tested-by: Bruno Bierbaumer <bruno@bierbaumer.net>
> [MBP 11,3 2013 intel HSW + nvidia GK107 retina]
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Fixes: a8bb6818270c ("drm/i915: Fix error path leak in fbdev fb
> allocation")
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 421ac15..68d051d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -10033,20 +10033,17 @@ __intel_framebuffer_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> int ret;
>
> intel_fb = kzalloc(sizeof(*intel_fb), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!intel_fb) {
> - drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
> + if (!intel_fb)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> - }
>
> ret = intel_framebuffer_init(dev, intel_fb, mode_cmd, obj);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
>
> return &intel_fb->base;
> +
> err:
> - drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
> kfree(intel_fb);
> -
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
>
> @@ -10086,6 +10083,7 @@ intel_framebuffer_create_for_mode(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> int depth, int bpp)
> {
> + struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 mode_cmd = { 0 };
>
> @@ -10100,7 +10098,11 @@ intel_framebuffer_create_for_mode(struct drm_device *dev,
> bpp);
> mode_cmd.pixel_format = drm_mode_legacy_fb_format(bpp, depth);
>
> - return intel_framebuffer_create(dev, &mode_cmd, obj);
> + fb = intel_framebuffer_create(dev, &mode_cmd, obj);
> + if (IS_ERR(fb))
> + drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&obj->base);
> +
> + return fb;
> }
>
> static struct drm_framebuffer *
> @@ -14289,6 +14291,7 @@ intel_user_framebuffer_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_file *filp,
> struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd)
> {
> + struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>
> obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, filp,
> @@ -14296,7 +14299,11 @@ intel_user_framebuffer_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> if (&obj->base == NULL)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>
> - return intel_framebuffer_create(dev, mode_cmd, obj);
> + fb = intel_framebuffer_create(dev, mode_cmd, obj);
> + if (IS_ERR(fb))
> + drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&obj->base);
> +
> + return fb;
This one looks good to me
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> }
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION
> --
> 2.1.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-13 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-30 9:06 [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/i915: Fix failure paths around initial fbdev allocation Lukas Wunner
2015-07-04 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/i915: On fb alloc failure, unref gem object where it gets refed Lukas Wunner
2015-10-13 15:39 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-10-13 15:04 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/i915: Fix failure paths around initial fbdev allocation Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-14 9:35 ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-15 17:14 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-10-15 17:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-15 17:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-18 18:03 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-10-25 11:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] fbdev deadlock & failure path fixes Lukas Wunner
2015-06-30 9:06 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] drm/i915: Fix failure paths around initial fbdev allocation Lukas Wunner
2015-10-30 18:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-07 10:41 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] fbdev fixes (reviewed) Lukas Wunner
2015-06-30 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] drm/i915: Fix failure paths around initial fbdev allocation Lukas Wunner
2015-07-04 9:50 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] drm/i915: On fb alloc failure, unref gem object where it gets refed Lukas Wunner
2015-10-22 11:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] drm/i915: Fix double unref in intelfb_alloc failure path Lukas Wunner
2015-11-09 14:23 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] fbdev fixes (reviewed) Jani Nikula
2015-11-12 19:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-11-13 7:06 ` Jani Nikula
2015-11-17 13:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-04 9:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] drm/i915: On fb alloc failure, unref gem object where it gets refed Lukas Wunner
2015-10-22 11:37 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] drm/i915: Fix double unref in intelfb_alloc failure path Lukas Wunner
2015-10-30 18:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-23 22:27 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] drm/i915: Fix error handling in intelfb_create Lukas Wunner
2015-10-30 18:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-08 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fbdev fixes (need review) Lukas Wunner
2015-11-03 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Tear down fbdev if initialization fails Lukas Wunner
2015-11-05 9:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Fix oops caused by fbdev initialization failure Lukas Wunner
2015-11-17 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fbdev fixes (need review) Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151013153931.GS26517@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox