From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Make wait_for_flips interruptible.
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:30:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019133037.GC13786@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445260613.3042.62.camel@gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:16:53PM +0300, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 13:27 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > @@ -13306,6 +13299,29 @@ intel_prepare_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + if (old_obj) {
> > + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> > + drm_atomic_get_existing_crtc_state(new_state->state,
> > plane->state->crtc);
> > +
> > + /* Big Hammer, we also need to ensure that any pending
> > + * MI_WAIT_FOR_EVENT inside a user batch buffer on the
> > + * current scanout is retired before unpinning the old
> > + * framebuffer. Note that we rely on userspace rendering
> > + * into the buffer attached to the pipe they are waiting
> > + * on. If not, userspace generates a GPU hang with IPEHR
> > + * point to the MI_WAIT_FOR_EVENT.
> > + *
> > + * This should only fail upon a hung GPU, in which case we
> > + * can safely continue.
> > + */
> > + if (needs_modeset(crtc_state))
> > + ret = i915_gem_object_wait_rendering(old_obj, true);
> > +
> > + /* Swallow -EIO errors to allow updates during hw lockup. */
> > + if (ret && ret != -EIO)
> > + goto out;
>
> Doesn't this change the behavior of a modeset after a GPU hang? Since
> mm.interruptible is true, i915_gem_check_wedge() might return -EAGAIN instead of
> -EIO. Previously the modeset would continue in that scenario, but now, somewhat
> contrary to the comment above, we don't continue and instead pass the -EAGAIN to
> user space.
It's "while the gpu hang is pending" not "after", but this change is the
hole point of making pinning interruptible. With current modeset code the
only thing we could hope for is that the reset would go through, and
otherwise we'd have to fail the modeset. Now we can correctly retry the
operation if it has run into a concurrent gpu hang/reset.
Note that we still should eat any -EIO, since modesets must continue even
if the render side is completely dead.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-23 11:27 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915: Interruptible framebuffer pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2015-09-23 11:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Make plane fb tracking work correctly, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-14 12:59 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-14 13:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-09-23 11:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Make prepare_plane_fb fully interruptible Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-16 11:21 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-19 9:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-23 11:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Make wait_for_flips interruptible Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-19 13:16 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-19 13:30 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-10-20 7:38 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-20 8:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-20 13:07 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-19 14:38 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-19 15:09 ` [PATCH 2.9/5] drm/i915: Do not wait for flips in intel_crtc_disable_noatomic Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-20 12:56 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-20 18:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-23 11:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Change locking for struct_mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-28 22:48 ` Matt Roper
2015-11-02 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: Change locking for struct_mutex, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-02 13:06 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-02 13:55 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-09-23 11:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Wait for object idle without locks in atomic_commit Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-29 0:30 ` Matt Roper
2015-11-02 13:13 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-02 13:46 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-02 13:53 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-02 13:58 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151019133037.GC13786@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=conselvan2@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox