From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: "Kumar, Mahesh" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/skl+: Fix Watermark calculation for Broxton
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:53:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151023165335.GE17664@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442859078-28226-1-git-send-email-mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:41:18PM +0530, Kumar, Mahesh wrote:
> In case of Y-Tiling, "plane_blocks_per_line" calculation is different
> than X/None-Tiling case.
> This patch corrects this calculation according to Bspec.
> plane blocks per line = Plane memory format is Y tile ?
> ceiling[4 * plane bytes per line / 512]/4 :
> ceiling[plane bytes per line / 512]
> As per BSpec Don't increment selected "result_blocks" & "result_lines"
> in case of BROXTON.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar, Mahesh <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Confirmed both changes against bspec. Note that your first hunk here is
technically a fix for both SKL and BXT, only the second one is a
BXT-specific fix.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index a1ed920..5cfb5d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3247,7 +3247,13 @@ static bool skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> latency);
>
> plane_bytes_per_line = p_params->horiz_pixels * bytes_per_pixel;
> - plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
> +
> + if (p_params->tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
> + p_params->tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
> + plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(4 * plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
> + plane_blocks_per_line /= 4;
> + } else
> + plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
>
> if (p_params->tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
> p_params->tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
> @@ -3277,7 +3283,7 @@ static bool skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> res_blocks = selected_result + 1;
> res_lines = DIV_ROUND_UP(selected_result, plane_blocks_per_line);
>
> - if (level >= 1 && level <= 7) {
> + if (level >= 1 && level <= 7 && !IS_BROXTON(dev_priv->dev)) {
> if (p_params->tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
> p_params->tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED)
> res_lines += 4;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-23 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-21 18:11 [PATCH] drm/i915/skl+: Fix Watermark calculation for Broxton Kumar, Mahesh
2015-10-23 16:53 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2015-11-17 14:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-17 14:52 ` Jani Nikula
2015-11-17 15:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151023165335.GE17664@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mahesh1.kumar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox