From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: i915 render node discovery buggy?
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:24:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027102436.GH8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In passing, while reading the Intel DDX driver code, I've noticed
that the Intel driver contains code which assumes that the master and
render devices are related by minor device number, eg:
/* Are we a render-node ourselves? */
if (is_render_node(fd, &master))
return NULL;
sprintf(buf, "/dev/dri/renderD%d", (int)((master.st_rdev | 0x80) & 0xbf));
if (stat(buf, &render) == 0 &&
master.st_mode == render.st_mode &&
render.st_rdev == ((master.st_rdev | 0x80) & 0xbf))
return strdup(buf);
There's also code doing the reverse as well.
From my observations, the assumption that this code is built upon is
false. I have an ARM platform here (non-Intel graphics) which shows
the problem - we have a KMS-only DRM driver (card0) and a GPU-only
DRM driver (card1). This populates the /dev/dri subdirectory as
follows:
crw-rw----+ 1 root video 226, 0 Oct 27 04:59 card0
crw-rw----+ 1 root video 226, 1 Oct 26 20:40 card1
crw-rw---- 1 root video 226, 64 Oct 26 20:40 controlD64
crw-rw---- 1 root video 226, 128 Oct 26 20:40 renderD128
and if I look at /sys/class/drm, you can then see who owns which devices:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 26 20:40 card0 -> ../../devices/platform/armada-drm/drm/card0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 26 20:40 card0-HDMI-A-1 -> ../../devices/platform/armada-drm/drm/card0/card0-HDMI-A-1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 26 20:40 card1 -> ../../devices/platform/etnaviv/drm/card1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 26 20:40 controlD64 -> ../../devices/platform/armada-drm/drm/controlD64
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 26 20:40 renderD128 -> ../../devices/platform/etnaviv/drm/renderD128
So, renderD128 is card1's render node, which does not conform to the
assumption which the Intel DDX driver makes - (1 | 0x80) & 0xbf is
not 128. The same thing can happen if there's ever a case on Intel
hardware where a KMS DRM driver registers prior to the i915 driver.
I think the only way to properly determine which render nodes
correspond with which master node is to actually open the device and
check the device names, or parse sysfs - maybe reading the links of
/sys/class/drm, and checking which link dirname corresponds with the
master node.
Any comments?
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 10:24 Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-10-27 11:28 ` i915 render node discovery buggy? Martin Peres
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151027102436.GH8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox