From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip fence installation for objects with rotated views (v2)
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:48:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027134839.GE4437@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562F7D74.4080103@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:34:44PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 27/10/15 12:51, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 06:23:26PM -0700, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> >> While pinning a fb object to the display plane, only install a fence
> >> if the object is using a normal view. This corresponds with the
> >> behavior found in i915_gem_object_do_pin() where the fencability
> >> criteria is determined only for objects with normal views.
> >>
> >> v2:
> >> Look at the object's map_and_fenceable flag to determine whether to
> >> install a fence or not (Chris).
> >>
> >> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> index 52fb3f2..108c000 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> @@ -2357,7 +2357,8 @@ intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(struct drm_plane *plane,
> >> * framebuffer compression. For simplicity, we always install
> >> * a fence as the cost is not that onerous.
> >> */
> >> - ret = i915_gem_object_get_fence(obj);
> >> + if (obj->map_and_fenceable)
> >
> > This will now get the fence and pin it for the 90/270 view as well,
> > even though the fence doesn't even cover that particualr gtt mapping.
>
> I don't follow. obj->map_and_fenceable will be true only when normal
> view exists, so this avoids setting up the fence when no normal view
> exists and so avoids the WARN_ON in i915_gem_object_get_fence.
Sure, but it's pointless to use up a fence if all we care about
is the 90/270 mapping.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-12 1:44 [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sure fb objects with rotated views are also fenceable Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-12 7:49 ` Chris Wilson
2015-09-15 1:38 ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-14 9:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-09-15 2:09 ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-15 9:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-09-16 1:38 ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-16 2:05 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip fence installation for objects with rotated views Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-16 8:03 ` Chris Wilson
2015-09-16 17:36 ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-17 10:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-09-19 1:56 ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-19 1:57 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip fence installation for objects with rotated views (v2) Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-23 8:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-24 2:19 ` Vivek
2015-10-26 10:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-27 1:23 ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-10-27 10:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-27 12:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-27 13:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-27 13:48 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-10-27 14:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-27 18:03 ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-27 18:35 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-27 18:47 ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-27 18:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-28 10:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-29 1:24 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip fence installation for objects with rotated views (v3) Vivek Kasireddy
2015-10-29 10:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-29 13:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-29 13:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-30 1:54 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip fence installation for objects with rotated views (v4) Vivek Kasireddy
2015-10-30 9:44 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-05 12:01 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151027134839.GE4437@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox