Re: skylake + drm-next - warn city

["Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:35:58PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On ti, 2015-11-03 at 11:42 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Nov 2015, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Just booted drm-next on a Skylake laptop that happened to be on my
> > > desk for a few days.
> > >
> > > I wasn't impressed. I'm very disappointed. Doesn't anyone have any
> > > pride in the code they write anymore.
> > >
> > > Initially the previous sentence had a lot of curse words and was Linus
> > > like in it's stature, but I've been promised by twitter that being
> > > nice will get me better results, so let's make it so.
> > 
> > Much appreciated; we get the message.
> > 
> > > So could someone from Intel takes some responsibility for testing the
> > > code they send me actually you know works on the hardware it's meant
> > > to, or at least tell me what is going so horribly wrong here.
> > >
> > > the lockdep trace at the end doesn't look fun.
> 
> That's from the GuC firmware loader, so won't be fixed by the DMC
> patches. Ville mentioned he has a fix for that.

No, I don't. I probably just mentioned that I saw this lockdep spew
already some weeks ago, and complained about it at the time. I think
Daniel tried to ping someone specific about it, but no idea if they
took any notice.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx