public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: don't disable_fbc() if FBC is already disabled
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:52:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151105155243.GK4437@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563B6D2F.5040704@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:52:31PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Op 05-11-15 om 12:29 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 05:10:51PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >> If FBC is disabled we will still call intel_fbc_invalidate(), and as a
> >> result we may call intel_fbc_deactivate(), which will try to touch
> >> registers.
> >>
> >> I'm pretty sure I saw this happen on a runtime suspended device, and
> > This is one of the BAT failures we have. I don't really understand why
> > we track the frontbuffer bits with FBC totally disabled, but this fix
> > seems simple enough on its own. Not sure if it applies without the
> > others, but if it doesn't I suggest trying to reorder the patchset so
> > we can put this in ASAP.
> >
> For the commit message what BAT is affected?

/me looks

pm_rpm@basic-rte at least.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-05 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-04 19:10 [PATCH 00/13] Yet another FBC series, v3 part 1 Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: rename intel_fbc_nuke to intel_fbc_recompress Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: extract fbc_on_pipe_a_only() Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: remove unnecessary check for crtc->primary->fb Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: extract crtc_is_valid() on the FBC code Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: use struct intel_crtc *crtc at __intel_fbc_update() Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: fix the __intel_fbc_update() comments Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: don't disable_fbc() if FBC is already disabled Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-05 11:29   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-05 14:52     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-05 15:52       ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: refactor FBC deactivation at init Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: remove too-frequent FBC debug message Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: fix the CFB size check Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-10 10:22   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-10 12:20     ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-11-10 13:04       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-11 13:39         ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-11-11 14:25           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-11 14:27         ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-11 15:36           ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: clarify that checking the FB stride for CFB is intentional Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: remove in_dbg_master check from intel_fbc.c Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 20:13   ` Jesse Barnes
2015-11-04 20:19     ` Jason Wessel
2015-11-04 20:26       ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-11-04 20:32         ` Jesse Barnes
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: remove newline from a no_fbc_reason message Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 00/13] Yet another FBC series, v3 part 1 Daniel Stone
2015-11-13 16:36   ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-11-13 16:58     ` Daniel Stone

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151105155243.GK4437@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox