From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: export assert_device_not_suspended
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 20:30:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151109183026.GC4437@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447093211-11469-2-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:20:08PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> We should use the same assert in more places, so export it. Move it to
> intel_runtime_pm.c at the same time, since that's a more logical place
> for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 7 -------
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index f9089df..373cc07 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1415,6 +1415,8 @@ void intel_display_power_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum intel_display_power_domain domain);
> void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum intel_display_power_domain domain);
> +
> +void assert_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_runtime_pm_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index b42506b..0d4a03b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -2120,6 +2120,12 @@ void intel_power_domains_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool resume)
> power_domains->initializing = false;
> }
>
> +void assert_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> + WARN_ONCE(HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv->dev) && dev_priv->pm.suspended,
Is there any point in the HAS_RUNTIME_PM() check?
> + "Device suspended\n");
> +}
> +
> /**
> * intel_power_domains_suspend - suspend power domain state
> * @dev_priv: i915 device instance
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index 5bb269c..2b93a68 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -50,13 +50,6 @@ intel_uncore_forcewake_domain_to_str(const enum forcewake_domain_id id)
> return "unknown";
> }
>
> -static void
> -assert_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> - WARN_ONCE(HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv->dev) && dev_priv->pm.suspended,
> - "Device suspended\n");
> -}
> -
> static inline void
> fw_domain_reset(const struct intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *d)
> {
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-09 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-09 18:20 [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
2015-11-09 18:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: export assert_device_not_suspended Imre Deak
2015-11-09 18:30 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-11-09 18:43 ` Imre Deak
2015-11-09 20:52 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-09 18:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: use assert_device_not_suspended instead of opencoding it Imre Deak
2015-11-09 21:04 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-09 18:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: make assert_device_not_suspended more precise Imre Deak
2015-11-09 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2015-11-09 21:44 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-10 9:47 ` Imre Deak
2015-11-18 14:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-18 14:44 ` Imre Deak
2015-11-18 14:58 ` Imre Deak
2015-11-18 15:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-18 15:11 ` Imre Deak
2015-11-18 15:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-18 16:09 ` Imre Deak
2015-11-09 18:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: add assert_device_not_suspended to GGTT PTE updaters Imre Deak
2015-11-09 18:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-09 18:48 ` Imre Deak
2015-11-09 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2015-11-09 21:11 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-09 21:24 ` Imre Deak
2015-11-09 21:29 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151109183026.GC4437@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox