From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:08:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151117170801.GP16848@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564B5BDA.1000904@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:54:50PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 17/11/15 16:39, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:27:12PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> >>
> >>In the following commit:
> >>
> >> commit e9f24d5fb7cf3628b195b18ff3ac4e37937ceeae
> >> Author: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> >> Date: Mon Oct 5 13:26:36 2015 +0100
> >>
> >> drm/i915: Clean up associated VMAs on context destruction
> >>
> >>I added a WARN_ON assertion that VM's active list must be empty
> >>at the time of owning context is getting freed, but that turned
> >>out to be a wrong assumption.
> >>
> >>Due ordering of operations in i915_gem_object_retire__read, where
> >>contexts are unreferenced before VMAs are moved to the inactive
> >>list, the described situation can in fact happen.
> >>
> >>It feels wrong to do things in such order so this fix makes sure
> >>a reference to context is held until the move to inactive list
> >>is completed.
> >>
> >>v2: Rather than hold a temporary context reference move the
> >> request unreference to be the last operation. (Daniel Vetter)
> >>
> >>v3: Fix use after free. (Chris Wilson)
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> >>Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92638
> >>Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
> >>Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >>Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >>---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> >>index 98c83286ab68..094ac17a712d 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> >>@@ -2404,29 +2404,32 @@ i915_gem_object_retire__read(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int ring)
> >> RQ_BUG_ON(!(obj->active & (1 << ring)));
> >>
> >> list_del_init(&obj->ring_list[ring]);
> >>- i915_gem_request_assign(&obj->last_read_req[ring], NULL);
> >>
> >> if (obj->last_write_req && obj->last_write_req->ring->id == ring)
> >> i915_gem_object_retire__write(obj);
> >>
> >> obj->active &= ~(1 << ring);
> >>- if (obj->active)
> >>- return;
> >
> > if (obj->active) {
> > i915_gem_request_assign(&obj->last_read_req[ring], NULL);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> >Would result in less churn in the code and drop the unecessary indent
> >level. Also comment is missing as to why we need to do things in a
> >specific order.
>
> Actually I think I changed my mind and that v1 is the way to go.
>
> Just re-ordering the code here still makes it possible for the context
> destructor to run with VMAs on the active list I think.
>
> If we hold the context then it is 100% clear it is not possible.
request_assign _is_ the function which adjust the refcounts for us, which
means if we drop that reference too early then grabbing a temp reference
is just papering over the real bug.
Written out your patch looks something like
a_reference(a);
a_unreference(a);
/* more cleanup code that should get run before a_unreference but isn't */
a_unrefernce(a); /* for real this time */
Unfortunately foo_assign is a new pattern and not well-established, so
that connection isn't clear. Maybe we should rename it to
foo_reference_assign to make it more obvious. Or just drop the pretense
and open-code it since we unconditionally assign NULL as the new pointer
value, and we know the current value of the pointer is non-NULL. So
there's really no benefit to the helper here, it only obfuscates. And
since that obfuscation tripped you up it's time to remove it ;-)
Cheers, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-17 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-26 11:05 [PATCH] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-26 11:23 ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-26 12:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-26 12:10 ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-26 13:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-03 10:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-03 10:55 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-03 11:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-17 15:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-17 16:04 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-17 16:27 ` [PATCH v3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-17 16:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-17 16:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-17 17:08 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-11-17 17:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-17 17:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-17 17:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-17 17:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-18 17:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-19 9:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-19 9:42 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-19 12:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-19 12:28 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151117170801.GP16848@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox