public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Tomi Sarvela <tomix.p.sarvela@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow unready gpu to be reset on gen8
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:40:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151117174032.GR16848@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446456308-13773-1-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com>

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 11:25:08AM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Gen9 has had demonstrated cases where forcing a not ready gpu
> into reset has caused system hang [1].
> 
> Gen8 has never to this date demonstrated such behaviour.
> 
> In our CI tests there have been two cases of bsw ending in a state
> where it claims it is not ready for reset, based on reset request,
> after gpu hang [2]. Both of these cases have happened with kernel
> where there are lots of debugs enabled. So it is possible that
> something timing related is at play here like that wait_for_register()
> usleep wakeups collide badly with forcewake.
> 
> If we assume that gen8 is safe to reset even with claims of nonreadiness,
> we can alleviate this situations by forcing a reset and revive the gpu.
> Enhance logging so that it will be clear what conditions led to decision
> of proceeding or bailing out, so that we will spot if this way of forcing
> our will against gpu turns out to be foolhardy.
> 
> v2: - add bugzilla entry for bsw behaviour (Chris)
>     - improve commit message
> 
> References [1]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89959
> References [2]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92774
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomix.p.sarvela@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index f0f97b2..47c17f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -1504,7 +1504,14 @@ not_ready:
>  		I915_WRITE(RING_RESET_CTL(engine->mmio_base),
>  			   _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(RESET_CTL_REQUEST_RESET));
>  
> -	return -EIO;
> +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 9) {
> +		DRM_ERROR("Reset would risk system stability, bailing out\n");
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	DRM_ERROR("Forcing non ready gpu into reset\n");

DRM_ERROR will cause dmes-warn failures when running igt. If we agree that
this is ok, it should be at most DRM_INFO. I'd got with DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER.
Ack with that change.
-Daniel

> +
> +	return gen6_do_reset(dev);
>  }
>  
>  static int (*intel_get_gpu_reset(struct drm_device *dev))(struct drm_device *)
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-17 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-30 14:43 [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow unready gpu to be reset on gen8 Mika Kuoppala
2015-10-30 14:58 ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-30 15:18   ` Mika Kuoppala
2015-10-30 15:28     ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-30 16:07       ` Mika Kuoppala
2015-11-02  8:35         ` Sarvela, TomiX P
2015-11-02  9:25       ` Mika Kuoppala
2015-11-17 17:40         ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-11-19  9:41           ` Mika Kuoppala
2015-11-19 15:33             ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-30  9:48               ` Jani Nikula
2016-01-08 16:31                 ` Mika Kuoppala
2016-01-08 16:52                   ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151117174032.GR16848@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tomix.p.sarvela@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox