public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: Dump in-flight plane state while dumping in-flight CRTC state
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:31:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151204093155.GF10243@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56603548.6050204@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:27:52PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 25-11-15 om 17:48 schreef Matt Roper:
> > The intel_dump_pipe_config() always dumps the currently active plane
> > state for each plane on a CRTC.  If we're calling this function to dump
> > CRTC state that is in-flight (not yet active), then this mismatch can be
> > misleading and confusing.  Let's pay attention to whether the state
> > we're dumping is part of an in-flight transaction (because
> > crtc_state->state is non-NULL); if it is, we'll dump the corresponding
> > in-flight plane state instead of the active state.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index d03a235..0e74287 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -12162,11 +12162,23 @@ static void intel_dump_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >  
> >  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("planes on this crtc\n");
> >  	list_for_each_entry(plane, &dev->mode_config.plane_list, head) {
> > +		struct drm_plane_state *ps = NULL;
> > +
> >  		intel_plane = to_intel_plane(plane);
> >  		if (intel_plane->pipe != crtc->pipe)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> > -		state = to_intel_plane_state(plane->state);
> > +		/* Get in-flight plane state, if any */
> > +		if (pipe_config->base.state)
> > +			ps = drm_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(pipe_config->base.state,
> > +								 plane);
> > +
> > +		/* If no in-flight state, use active state instead */
> > +		if (!ps)
> > +			ps = plane->state;
> > +
> Could plane state be removed from dump_pipe_config instead? There's no good way to do it race free and
> it's better to do it in intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes.

Yeah dump_pipe_config is meant for debugging crtc_config mismatches. No
point in dumping plane state. Especially since we can validate all the
plane stuff through CRC based testcases anyway.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-04  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-25 16:48 [PATCH 0/9] Wrap up ILK-style atomic watermarks Matt Roper
2015-11-25 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: Disable primary plane if we fail to reconstruct BIOS fb Matt Roper
2015-12-03 11:40   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-25 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: Dump in-flight plane state while dumping in-flight CRTC state Matt Roper
2015-12-03 12:27   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-12-04  9:31     ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-11-25 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Clarify plane state during CRTC state dumps (v2) Matt Roper
2015-12-03 12:28   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-25 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: Dump pipe config after initial FB is reconstructed Matt Roper
2015-12-03 12:29   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-25 16:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: Setup clipped src/dest coordinates during FB reconstruction (v2) Matt Roper
2015-12-03 12:06   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-12-03 17:08     ` Matt Roper
2015-11-25 16:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: Convert hsw_compute_linetime_wm to use in-flight state Matt Roper
2015-11-25 16:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Add extra paranoia to ILK watermark calculations Matt Roper
2015-11-25 16:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: Sanitize watermarks after hardware state readout (v2) Matt Roper
2015-11-25 17:05   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-30 23:56     ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Sanitize watermarks after hardware state readout (v3) Matt Roper
2015-12-01  7:42       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-30  9:50   ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: Sanitize watermarks after hardware state readout (v2) Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-30 23:09     ` Matt Roper
2015-11-30 23:22     ` [PATCH] drm/atomic-helper: Grab connection_mutex while duplicating state Matt Roper
2015-12-01  7:24       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-01  7:37       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-25 16:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Add two-stage ILK-style watermark programming (v7) Matt Roper
2015-11-25 17:08   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-01  0:08     ` Matt Roper
2015-11-25 17:00 ` [PATCH 0/9] Wrap up ILK-style atomic watermarks Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-25 17:04   ` Matt Roper
2015-11-25 17:14     ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151204093155.GF10243@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox