intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: disable power well support on platforms without runtime PM support
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 22:57:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215205731.GT4437@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450203038-5150-3-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:10:30PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> All platforms with power well support have runtime PM support, so
> simplify things by explicitly disabling power well support on platforms
> without runtime PM support. This results in holding the init power domain
> reference whenever the driver is loaded in addition to an RPM reference,
> which reflects the reality better and makes it possible to simplify
> things by removing the HAS_RUNTIME_PM special casing from more places in
> a follow-up patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 9945040..f4ff5f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -1908,6 +1908,11 @@ static int
>  sanitize_disable_power_well_option(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  				   int disable_power_well)
>  {
> +	if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv)) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No runtime PM support, disabling display power well support\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}

Feels a bit too magic to me. Needs a comment at least, otherwise someone
is going to change disable_power_well back into something you can disable
at runtime and then all the old stuff might break.

Grabbing an extra rpm reference explicitly for this purpose might be
less confusing.

> +
>  	if (disable_power_well >= 0)
>  		return !!disable_power_well;
>  
> -- 
> 2.5.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-15 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-15 18:10 [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: clarify comment about mandatory RPM put/get during driver load/unload Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:44   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: disable power well support on platforms without runtime PM support Imre Deak
2015-12-15 20:57   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-12-15 22:55     ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:12     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-16 13:21       ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 17:31         ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-16 18:13           ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: refactor RPM disabling due to RC6 being disabled Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:54   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:01     ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:56   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 13:49   ` [PATCH 4.1/10] drm/i915: get a permanent RPM reference on platforms w/o RPM support Imre Deak
2015-12-16 13:53     ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2015-12-16 17:26       ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-16 18:22         ` Imre Deak
2015-12-17 11:44       ` [PATCH v3.1/10] " Imre Deak
2015-12-17 11:48   ` [PATCH v5 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-12-17 12:46     ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper Imre Deak
2015-12-16 12:11   ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 12:54     ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 13:02       ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 13:39         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 13:43           ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: use assert_rpm_wakelock_held instead of opencoding it Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference Imre Deak
2015-12-15 21:07   ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-15 22:52     ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16  0:14       ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16  0:52   ` [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: check that we hold an RPM wakelock ref before we put it Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:00   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:07     ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 12:49       ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:06   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-16 22:53     ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: check that we are in an RPM atomic section in GGTT PTE updaters Imre Deak
2015-12-17 14:44 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151215205731.GT4437@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).